NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Glynn, Adam N.; Ichino, Nahomi – Sociological Methods & Research, 2016
We delineate the underlying homogeneity assumption, procedural variants, and implications of the comparative method and distinguish this from Mill's method of difference. We demonstrate that additional units can provide "placebo" tests for the comparative method even if the scope of inference is limited to the two units under comparison.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Research Methodology, Causal Models, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Freedman, David A. – Evaluation Review, 2006
Experiments offer more reliable evidence on causation than observational studies, which is not to gainsay the contribution to knowledge from observation. Experiments should be analyzed as experiments, not as observational studies. A simple comparison of rates might be just the right tool, with little value added by "sophisticated" models. This…
Descriptors: Experiments, Control Groups, Inferences, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boets, Bart; Ghesquiere, Pol; van Wieringen, Astrid; Wouters, Jan – Brain and Language, 2007
We tested categorical perception and speech-in-noise perception in a group of five-year-old preschool children genetically at risk for dyslexia, compared to a group of well-matched control children and a group of adults. Both groups of children differed significantly from the adults on all speech measures. Comparing both child groups, the risk…
Descriptors: Phonology, Preschool Children, Causal Models, Auditory Perception