Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Connected Discourse | 2 |
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Grammar | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Writing Evaluation | 2 |
| Academic Language | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Ahmadi, Saeed | 1 |
| Bavali, Mohammad | 1 |
| Fernandez, Miguel | 1 |
| Riasati, Mohammad Javad | 1 |
| Siddiqui, Athar Munir | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ahmadi, Saeed; Riasati, Mohammad Javad; Bavali, Mohammad – International Journal of Instruction, 2019
The present study aimed at investigating whether academic IELTS candidates perform differently in writing on either a chart topic or a table topic of the IELTS writing task 1 with regard to the four IELTS writing marking criteria i.e. task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammar range and accuracy. The study adopted a…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Language Tests, Second Language Learning, Writing Tests
Fernandez, Miguel; Siddiqui, Athar Munir – Language Testing in Asia, 2017
Background: Marking of essays is mainly carried out by human raters who bring in their own subjective and idiosyncratic evaluation criteria, which sometimes lead to discrepancy. This discrepancy may in turn raise issues like reliability and fairness. The current research attempts to explore the evaluation criteria of markers on a national level…
Descriptors: Grading, Evaluators, Evaluation Criteria, High Stakes Tests

Peer reviewed
Direct link
