Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Comprehension | 3 |
| Visual Learning | 3 |
| Television Research | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Audience Response | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Communication Skills | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Hearing Impairments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Beattie, R. G. | 1 |
| Brown, Susan K. McCann | 1 |
| Cohen, David I. | 1 |
| Fisch, Shalom M. | 1 |
| Gunter, Barrie | 1 |
| Markides, A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gunter, Barrie – Journal of Educational Television and Other Media, 1980
Nine televised news stories were presented to 60 college students under newscaster-only, newscaster-plus-film, or newscaster-plus-stills formats, and information gain was tested using a multiple-choice questionnaire administered immediately after viewing. Overall learning differences were nonsignificant. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comprehension, Intermode Differences, Learning
Beattie, R. G.; Markides, A. – ACEHI Journal, 1992
This study found significantly better lipreading scores by 31 children with hearing impairments than by 15 children with normal hearing (all 10 and 11 years old). However, correlations between degree of hearing loss and lipreading ability were nonsignificant. The study provides partial support for the doctrine of sensory compensation. (DB)
Descriptors: Children, Communication Skills, Comparative Analysis, Comprehension
Fisch, Shalom M.; Brown, Susan K. McCann; Cohen, David I. – 1999
Several current television series for preschool children convey stories, not through meaningful dialogue, but through visual information and intonational cues embedded within nonsensical dialogue. This study examined young children's ability to construct meaning from such materials. Participating were 135 preschoolers, 3 to 5 years old. Subjects…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Audience Response, Comparative Analysis, Comprehension


