Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Communication Problems | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Deafness | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Nonverbal Communication | 2 |
| Sign Language | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| American Sign Language | 1 |
| Autism | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Classroom Communication | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Atkinson, Joanna | 1 |
| Battison, Robbin M. | 1 |
| Campbell, Ruth | 1 |
| Denmark, Tanya | 1 |
| Jordan, I. King | 1 |
| Swettenham, John | 1 |
| Tevenal, Stephanie | 1 |
| Villanueva, Miako | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Denmark, Tanya; Atkinson, Joanna; Campbell, Ruth; Swettenham, John – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2014
Facial expressions in sign language carry a variety of communicative features. While emotion can modulate a spoken utterance through changes in intonation, duration and intensity, in sign language specific facial expressions presented concurrently with a manual sign perform this function. When deaf adult signers cannot see facial features, their…
Descriptors: Sign Language, Nonverbal Communication, Deafness, Hearing Impairments
Tevenal, Stephanie; Villanueva, Miako – Sign Language Studies, 2009
When hearing speakers address a mixed audience of hearing and deaf participants,[1] they have a choice of three methods by which to convey the information in their presentation. They may choose to use English and provide an English-to-ASL interpreter, use ASL and provide an ASL-to-English interpreter, or use simultaneous communication (SimCom).…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Partial Hearing, Deafness, American Sign Language
Peer reviewedJordan, I. King; Battison, Robbin M. – Sign Language Studies, 1987
Describes an experiment comparing communication accuracy within and between various sign languages from different countries. Longer communications were generally more successful than shorter ones. Deaf signers understand their own sign language better than they do foreign sign languages. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Communication Aids (for Disabled), Communication Problems, Comparative Analysis, Deafness

Direct link
