Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Arithmetic | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| English Language Learners | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Mathematics Skills | 1 |
| Native Language | 1 |
| Numeracy | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Ben Clarke | 1 |
| David Fainstein | 1 |
| Joe Dimino | 1 |
| Keith Smolkowski | 1 |
| Marah Sutherland | 1 |
| Russell M. Gersten | 1 |
| Tasia Brafford | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Ohio | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkTasia Brafford; Ben Clarke; Russell M. Gersten; Keith Smolkowski; Marah Sutherland; Joe Dimino; David Fainstein – Grantee Submission, 2023
We investigated the technical characteristics of a brief early numeracy screening battery for both English learners (ELs) and English proficient students (EPs). Results indicated there were differences in performance of ELs and EPs. Further, we found reasonable overall accuracy of the screener predicting student outcomes. Similar overall accuracy…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Numeracy, English Language Learners, Prediction
