NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Structural Equation Modeling3
Education Level
Higher Education1
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Li, Fuzhong; Duncan, Terry E.; Harmer, Peter; Acock, Alan; Stoolmiller, Mike – Structural Equation Modeling, 1998
Discusses the utility of multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical linear modeling methods in testing measurement models in which the underlying attribute may vary as a function of levels of observation. A real dataset is used to illustrate the two approaches and their comparability. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Measurement Techniques, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tsai, Rung-Ching; Wu, Tsung-Lin – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
By postulating that the random utilities associated with the choice options follow a multivariate normal distribution, Thurstonian models (Thurstone, 1927) provide a straightforward representation of paired comparison data. The use of Monte Carlo Expectation-Maximization (MCEM) algorithms and limited information approaches have been proposed to…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Jichuan – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
In addition to assessing the rate of change in outcome measures, it may be useful to test the significance of outcome changes during specific time periods within an entire observation period under study. While discussing the delta method and bootstrapping, this study demonstrates how to use these 2 methods to estimate the standard errors of the…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Error of Measurement, Measures (Individuals), Comparative Analysis