NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rutten, Roel – Sociological Methods & Research, 2022
Applying qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to large Ns relaxes researchers' case-based knowledge. This is problematic because causality in QCA is inferred from a dialogue between empirical, theoretical, and case-based knowledge. The lack of case-based knowledge may be remedied by various robustness tests. However, being a case-based method,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Case Studies, Attribution Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oliveira, Nuno; Secchi, Davide – Sociological Methods & Research, 2023
Researchers increasingly take advantage of the comparative case design to build theory, but the degree of case dependence is occasionally discussed and theorized. We suggest that the comparative case study design might be subject to an often underappreciated threat--dependence across cases--under certain conditions. Using research on innovation…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Case Studies, Research Design, Innovation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pacewicz, Josh – Sociological Methods & Research, 2022
Most social scientists agree that case studies are useful for "theory building," but ethnographic methods papers often look to survey research for case selection strategies. This is due to a common but untenable distinction between theoretical and empirical generalization, which obscures how theoretically inclined ethnographers make…
Descriptors: Ethnography, Social Sciences, Generalization, Sociology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomann, Eva; Maggetti, Martino – Sociological Methods & Research, 2020
Recent years have witnessed a host of innovations for conducting research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Concurrently, important issues surrounding its uses have been highlighted. In this article, we seek to help users design QCA studies. We argue that establishing inference with QCA involves three intertwined design components:…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Comparative Analysis, Research Design, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Tenglong; Frank, Ken – Sociological Methods & Research, 2022
The internal validity of observational study is often subject to debate. In this study, we define the counterfactuals as the unobserved sample and intend to quantify its relationship with the null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST). We propose the probability of a robust inference for internal validity, that is, the PIV, as a robustness index…
Descriptors: Probability, Inferences, Validity, Correlation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Damian, Elena; Meuleman, Bart; van Oorschot, Wim – Sociological Methods & Research, 2022
In this article, we examine whether cross-national studies disclose enough information for independent researchers to evaluate the validity and reliability of the findings (evaluation transparency) or to perform a direct replication (replicability transparency). The first contribution is theoretical. We develop a heuristic theoretical model…
Descriptors: National Surveys, Cross Cultural Studies, Social Science Research, Periodicals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braumoeller, Bear F. – Sociological Methods & Research, 2017
Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) has become one of the most prominent methods in the social sciences for capturing causal complexity, especially for scholars with small- and medium-"N" data sets. This research note explores two key assumptions in fsQCA's methodology for testing for necessary and sufficient…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Comparative Analysis, Social Science Research, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Legleye, Stéphane; Charrance, Géraldine; Razafindratsima, Nicolas; Bajos, Nathalie; Bohet, Aline; Moreau, Caroline – Sociological Methods & Research, 2018
Background: Reliability of nonprobability online volunteer panels for epidemiological purposes has rarely been studied. Objectives: To assess the quality of a questionnaire on sexual and reproductive health (SRH) administered in a nonprobability Web panel and in a random telephone survey (n = 8,992; n = 8,437, age 16-49 years). Especially, we were…
Descriptors: Sexuality, Birth, Questionnaires, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lichterman, Paul; Reed, Isaac Ariail – Sociological Methods & Research, 2015
We propose three interlinked ways that theory helps researchers build causal claims from ethnographic research. First, theory guides the casing and re-casing of a topic of study. Second, theoretical work helps craft a clear causal question via the construction of a contrast space of the topic of investigation. Third, the researcher uses theory to…
Descriptors: Ethnography, Attribution Theory, Role, Sociology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Møller, Jørgen – Sociological Methods & Research, 2016
The use of controlled comparisons pervades comparative historical analysis. Heated debates have surrounded the methodological purchase of such comparisons. However, the quality and validity of the conceptual building blocks on which the comparisons are based have largely been ignored. This article discusses a particular problem pertaining to these…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, History, Evaluation Methods, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mustillo, Sarah; Li, Miao; Ferraro, Kenneth F. – Sociological Methods & Research, 2021
Most studies of the early origins of adult health rely on summing dichotomously measured negative exposures to measure childhood misfortune (CM), neglect, adversity, or trauma. There are several limitations to this approach, including that it assumes each exposure carries the same level of risk for a particular outcome. Further, it often leads…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Child Neglect, Trauma, Disadvantaged
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dülmer, Hermann – Sociological Methods & Research, 2016
The factorial survey is an experimental design consisting of varying situations (vignettes) that have to be judged by respondents. For more complex research questions, it quickly becomes impossible for an individual respondent to judge all vignettes. To overcome this problem, random designs are recommended most of the time, whereas quota designs…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Reliability, Validity, Benchmarking