Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Block Scheduling | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Introductory Courses | 1 |
| Scheduling | 1 |
| Science Instruction | 1 |
| Surveys | 1 |
Source
| Science Educator | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkMaltese, Adam V.; Dexter, Kirsten M.; Tai, Robert H.; Sadler, Philip M. – Science Educator, 2007
Using a national survey of more than 7,000 students from 128 different college introductory science courses, the authors compared students who experienced Block scheduling and Traditional scheduling in high school. (Contains 1 table and 2 figures.)
Descriptors: Scheduling, Block Scheduling, Science Instruction, Introductory Courses
