Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
| Psychological Methods | 10 |
Author
| Bentler, Peter M. | 1 |
| Bird, Kevin D. | 1 |
| Bockenholt, Ulf | 1 |
| Clark, M. H. | 1 |
| Cook, Thomas D. | 1 |
| Dekle, Dawn J. | 1 |
| Harring, Jeffrey R. | 1 |
| Hsu, Jui-Chen | 1 |
| Ledermann, Thomas | 1 |
| Leung, Denis H. Y. | 1 |
| Li, Libo | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Li, Libo; Bentler, Peter M. – Psychological Methods, 2011
MacCallum, Browne, and Cai (2006) proposed a new framework for evaluation and power analysis of small differences between nested structural equation models (SEMs). In their framework, the null and alternative hypotheses for testing a small difference in fit and its related power analyses were defined by some chosen root-mean-square error of…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Rindskopf, David – Psychological Methods, 2012
Muthen and Asparouhov (2012) made a strong case for the advantages of Bayesian methodology in factor analysis and structural equation models. I show additional extensions and adaptations of their methods and show how non-Bayesians can take advantage of many (though not all) of these advantages by using interval restrictions on parameters. By…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Factor Analysis, Computation
Macho, Siegfried; Ledermann, Thomas – Psychological Methods, 2011
The phantom model approach for estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects within structural equation models (SEMs) is presented. The rationale underlying this novel method consists in representing the specific effect to be assessed as a total effect within a separate latent variable model, the phantom model that is added to the main…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis, Sampling
Bird, Kevin D. – Psychological Methods, 2011
Any set of confidence interval inferences on J - 1 linearly independent contrasts on J means, such as the two comparisons [mu][subscript 1] - [mu][subscript 2] and [mu][subscript 2] - [mu][subscript 3] on 3 means, provides a basis for the deduction of interval inferences on all other contrasts, such as the redundant comparison [mu][subscript 1] -…
Descriptors: Intervals, Statistical Analysis, Inferences, Comparative Analysis
McGrath, Robert E.; Walters, Glenn D. – Psychological Methods, 2012
Statistical analyses investigating latent structure can be divided into those that estimate structural model parameters and those that detect the structural model type. The most basic distinction among structure types is between categorical (discrete) and dimensional (continuous) models. It is a common, and potentially misleading, practice to…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Computation
Harring, Jeffrey R.; Weiss, Brandi A.; Hsu, Jui-Chen – Psychological Methods, 2012
Two Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare methods for estimating and testing hypotheses of quadratic effects in latent variable regression models. The methods considered in the current study were (a) a 2-stage moderated regression approach using latent variable scores, (b) an unconstrained product indicator approach, (c) a latent…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Geometric Concepts, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Steiner, Peter M.; Cook, Thomas D.; Shadish, William R.; Clark, M. H. – Psychological Methods, 2010
The assumption of strongly ignorable treatment assignment is required for eliminating selection bias in observational studies. To meet this assumption, researchers often rely on a strategy of selecting covariates that they think will control for selection bias. Theory indicates that the most important covariates are those highly correlated with…
Descriptors: Selection, Bias, Observation, Comparative Analysis
Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models: Integration of Fit Indices from SEM and MLM Frameworks
Wu, Wei; West, Stephen G.; Taylor, Aaron B. – Psychological Methods, 2009
Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Longitudinal Studies, Comparative Analysis
Dekle, Dawn J.; Leung, Denis H. Y.; Zhu, Min – Psychological Methods, 2008
Across many areas of psychology, concordance is commonly used to measure the (intragroup) agreement in ranking a number of items by a group of judges. Sometimes, however, the judges come from multiple groups, and in those situations, the interest is to measure the concordance between groups, under the assumption that there is some within-group…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Statistical Analysis, Psychological Studies, Evaluators
Maydeu-Olivares, Albert; Bockenholt, Ulf – Psychological Methods, 2005
L. L. Thurstone's (1927) model provides a powerful framework for modeling individual differences in choice behavior. An overview of Thurstonian models for comparative data is provided, including the classical Case V and Case III models as well as more general choice models with unrestricted and factor-analytic covariance structures. A flow chart…
Descriptors: Flow Charts, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Decision Making

Peer reviewed
Direct link
