Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Brain | 1 |
| Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Familiarity | 1 |
| Figurative Language | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Pretesting | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (Nottingham) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Filik, Ruth; Leuthold, Hartmut; Wallington, Katie; Page, Jemma – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Not much is known about how people comprehend ironic utterances, and to date, most studies have simply compared processing of ironic versus non-ironic statements. A key aspect of the graded salience hypothesis, distinguishing it from other accounts (such as the standard pragmatic view and direct access view), is that it predicts differences…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Cognitive Measurement, Figurative Language, Language Processing

Peer reviewed
Direct link
