Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Coding | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Expertise | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Dialogs (Language) | 1 |
| Early Adolescents | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Discourse Processes: A… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mayweg-Paus, Elisabeth; Macagno, Fabrizio; Kuhn, Deanna – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
The study presented here examines how interacting with a more capable interlocutor influences use of argumentation strategies in electronic discourse. To address this question, 54 young adolescents participating in an intervention centered on electronic peer dialogs were randomly assigned to either an experimental or control condition. In both…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Computer Mediated Communication, Interaction, Early Adolescents
Burkett, Candice; Goldman, Susan R. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
Comparisons of literary experts and novices indicate that experts engage in interpretive processes to "get the point" during their reading of literary texts but novices do not. In two studies the reading and interpretive processes of literary novices (undergraduates with no formal training in literature study) were elicited through…
Descriptors: Literature, Novices, Undergraduate Students, Protocol Analysis

Peer reviewed
Direct link
