Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 4 |
| Simulation | 4 |
| Models | 3 |
| Computation | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| American Sign Language | 1 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Science | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 4 |
Author
| Arunachalam, Sudha | 1 |
| Fitch, Allison | 1 |
| Gentner, Dedre | 1 |
| Kim, Woojae | 1 |
| Lee, Michael D. | 1 |
| Lieberman, Amy M. | 1 |
| Lovett, Andrew | 1 |
| Montenegro, Maximiliano | 1 |
| Myung, Jay I. | 1 |
| Pitt, Mark A. | 1 |
| Pooley, James | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Illinois | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fitch, Allison; Arunachalam, Sudha; Lieberman, Amy M. – Cognitive Science, 2021
Across languages, children map words to meaning with great efficiency, despite a seemingly unconstrained space of potential mappings. The literature on how children do this is primarily limited to spoken language. This leaves a gap in our understanding of sign language acquisition, because several of the hypothesized mechanisms that children use…
Descriptors: American Sign Language, Language Acquisition, Simulation, Cues
Sagi, Eyal; Gentner, Dedre; Lovett, Andrew – Cognitive Science, 2012
Detecting that two images are different is faster for highly dissimilar images than for highly similar images. Paradoxically, we showed that the reverse occurs when people are asked to describe "how" two images differ--that is, to state a difference between two images. Following structure-mapping theory, we propose that this…
Descriptors: Differences, Identification, Comparative Analysis, Cognitive Processes
Pitt, Mark A.; Myung, Jay I.; Montenegro, Maximiliano; Pooley, James – Cognitive Science, 2008
A primary criterion on which models of cognition are evaluated is their ability to fit empirical data. To understand the reason why a model yields a good or poor fit, it is necessary to determine the data-fitting potential (i.e., flexibility) of the model. In the first part of this article, methods for comparing models and studying their…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Computation, Schemata (Cognition), Comparative Analysis
Shiffrin, Richard M.; Lee, Michael D.; Kim, Woojae; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan – Cognitive Science, 2008
This article reviews current methods for evaluating models in the cognitive sciences, including theoretically based approaches, such as Bayes factors and minimum description length measures; simulation approaches, including model mimicry evaluations; and practical approaches, such as validation and generalization measures. This article argues…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Generalization, Sciences, Models

Peer reviewed
Direct link
