Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Computation | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Simulation | 2 |
| Auditory Perception | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Cognitive Science | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 2 |
Author
| Kim, Woojae | 1 |
| Lee, Michael D. | 1 |
| Montenegro, Maximiliano | 1 |
| Myung, Jay I. | 1 |
| Pitt, Mark A. | 1 |
| Pooley, James | 1 |
| Shiffrin, Richard M. | 1 |
| Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pitt, Mark A.; Myung, Jay I.; Montenegro, Maximiliano; Pooley, James – Cognitive Science, 2008
A primary criterion on which models of cognition are evaluated is their ability to fit empirical data. To understand the reason why a model yields a good or poor fit, it is necessary to determine the data-fitting potential (i.e., flexibility) of the model. In the first part of this article, methods for comparing models and studying their…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Computation, Schemata (Cognition), Comparative Analysis
Shiffrin, Richard M.; Lee, Michael D.; Kim, Woojae; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan – Cognitive Science, 2008
This article reviews current methods for evaluating models in the cognitive sciences, including theoretically based approaches, such as Bayes factors and minimum description length measures; simulation approaches, including model mimicry evaluations; and practical approaches, such as validation and generalization measures. This article argues…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Generalization, Sciences, Models

Peer reviewed
Direct link
