Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 3 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| College Instruction | 2 |
| Grading | 2 |
| Graduate Students | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| College English | 1 |
| College Freshmen | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Graduate Study | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Teaching of Psychology | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Frisbie, David A.; And Others – 1979
A guide to help instructors establish grading policies and practices or review and revise current grading procedures is presented. Advantages/disadvantages of four common comparisons used to determine grades are considered: comparisons with other students, comparisons with established standards, and comparisons based on learning relative to…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, College Instruction, Comparative Analysis, Grading
Peer reviewedMelvin, Kenneth B. – Teaching of Psychology, 1988
Introduces a method for reducing the subjectivity of class participation grades. Suggests the use of a combined peer/professor approach is beneficial and can be acceptable to students. Lists a number of variables which impact upon the activity while accenting the usefulness of the procedure. (KO)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Comparative Analysis, Grading, Graduate Study
Hartwell, Patrick – 1981
In an informal experiment, ten pairs of passages covering a range of writing (poems, narrative prose, legal writing, "educationalese," anthropology, and literary criticism) were presented to two sections of freshman English and two sections of a graduate seminar in which the students were primarily experienced high school and college…
Descriptors: College English, College Freshmen, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria


