Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Clarke, Ben | 3 |
| Doabler, Christian T. | 3 |
| Fien, Hank | 3 |
| Smolkowski, Keith | 3 |
| Baker, Scott K. | 2 |
| Strand Cary, Mari G. | 2 |
| Kosty, Derek | 1 |
| Kurtz Nelson, Evangeline | 1 |
| Turtura, Jessica | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 3 |
| Primary Education | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Kindergarten | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Oregon | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Strand Cary, Mari G.; Clarke, Ben; Doabler, Christian T.; Smolkowski, Keith; Fien, Hank; Baker, Scott K. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2017
We report on a practitioner implementation of Fusion, a first-grade mathematics intervention. Studies such as this evaluation of a loose implementation under realistic conditions are important to curriculum developers' understanding of how evidence-based programs and tools work under a variety of implementation scenarios. In this…
Descriptors: Grade 1, Mathematics Instruction, Evidence Based Practice, Curriculum Development
Strand Cary, Mari G.; Clarke, Ben; Doabler, Christian T.; Smolkowski, Keith; Fien, Hank; Baker, Scott K. – Grantee Submission, 2017
We report on a practitioner implementation of Fusion, a first grade mathematics intervention. Studies such as this evaluation of a loose implementation under realistic conditions are important to curriculum developers' understanding of how evidence-based programs and tools work under a variety of implementation scenarios. In this…
Descriptors: Grade 1, Mathematics Instruction, Evidence Based Practice, Curriculum Development
Clarke, Ben; Doabler, Christian T.; Kosty, Derek; Kurtz Nelson, Evangeline; Smolkowski, Keith; Fien, Hank; Turtura, Jessica – Grantee Submission, 2017
This study used a randomized controlled trial design to investigate the ROOTS curriculum, a 50-lesson kindergarten mathematics intervention. Ten ROOTS-eligible students per classroom (n = 60) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: a ROOTS five-student group, a ROOTS two-student group, and a no-treatment control group. Two primary…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Comparative Analysis, Kindergarten, Mathematics Instruction

Peer reviewed
Direct link
