Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Benchmarking | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Individual Development | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 1 |
| Performance | 1 |
| Policy Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Social Indicators Research | 2 |
Author
| Ang, B. W. | 2 |
| Zhou, P. | 2 |
| Zhou, D. Q. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Asia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhou, P.; Ang, B. W.; Zhou, D. Q. – Social Indicators Research, 2010
Composite indicators (CIs) have increasingly been accepted as a useful tool for benchmarking, performance comparisons, policy analysis and public communication in many different fields. Several recent studies show that as a data aggregation technique in CI construction the weighted product (WP) method has some desirable properties. However, a…
Descriptors: Policy Analysis, Scoring, Foreign Countries, Individual Development
Zhou, P.; Ang, B. W. – Social Indicators Research, 2009
Composite indicators have been increasingly recognized as a useful tool for performance monitoring, benchmarking comparisons and public communication in a wide range of fields. The usefulness of a composite indicator depends heavily on the underlying data aggregation scheme where multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is commonly used. A…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Benchmarking, Evaluation Criteria

Peer reviewed
Direct link
