Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Individual Testing | 2 |
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Children | 1 |
| Cognitive Measurement | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Learning Disabilities | 1 |
| Norms | 1 |
| Standardized Tests | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 2 |
| McCarthy Scales of Childrens… | 1 |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHolroyd, R. G.; Bickley, James – Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1976
The 1960 and 1972 revisions of the Stanford Binet, form LM are compared. The normative tables are examined in detail and the adequacy and usefulness of the 1972 revision is evaluated. The author concludes that the 1972 restandardization procedures reveal notable deficiencies which cause it to compare unfavorably with the McCarthy Scales and the…
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedYsseldyke, James; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Compares the performance of learning disabled students on the WISC-R and the Tests of Cognitive Abilities from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. This study finds that learning disabled subjects performed more poorly on the Tests of Cognitive Abilities than on the WISC-R. (Author)
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Elementary Education
