Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 7 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 11 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 13 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 13 |
| Natural Language Processing | 13 |
| Writing Evaluation | 13 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 8 |
| Feedback (Response) | 6 |
| Automation | 4 |
| Essays | 4 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 4 |
| Writing (Composition) | 4 |
| Writing Skills | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Adish Singla | 1 |
| Agustín Garagorry Guerra | 1 |
| Ahmed Ashraf Butt | 1 |
| Bernadictus O. Plaatjies | 1 |
| Burstein, Jill | 1 |
| Chaohua Ou | 1 |
| Danielle McNamara | 1 |
| Davies, Patricia Marybelle | 1 |
| Diane Litman | 1 |
| Gao, Yanjun | 1 |
| Huiying Cai | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 11 |
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 13 |
| Postsecondary Education | 13 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| China | 1 |
| New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedYang Zhong; Mohamed Elaraby; Diane Litman; Ahmed Ashraf Butt; Muhsin Menekse – Grantee Submission, 2024
This paper introduces REFLECTSUMM, a novel summarization dataset specifically designed for summarizing students' reflective writing. The goal of REFLECTSUMM is to facilitate developing and evaluating novel summarization techniques tailored to real-world scenarios with little training data, with potential implications in the opinion summarization…
Descriptors: Documentation, Writing (Composition), Reflection, Metadata
Qinghao Guan; Yangxi Han – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
As generative AI (GenAI) continues to permeate academia, distinguishing between student-authored essays and those by Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes crucial for maintaining academic integrity. This study conducted a survey on the ethical awareness of using generative AI tools among a group of STEM students (n=156). Also, we empirically…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Artificial Intelligence, Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Victor-Alexandru Padurean; Tung Phung; Nachiket Kotalwar; Michael Liut; Juho Leinonen; Paul Denny; Adish Singla – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2025
The growing need for automated and personalized feedback in programming education has led to recent interest in leveraging generative AI for feedback generation. However, current approaches tend to rely on prompt engineering techniques in which predefined prompts guide the AI to generate feedback. This can result in rigid and constrained responses…
Descriptors: Automation, Student Writing Models, Feedback (Response), Programming
Mickie De Wet; Margarita Oja Da Silva; René Bohnsack – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
This study explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to generate feedback on essay-type assignments in Higher Education. Drawing on a seminal feedback framework, it examines the pedagogical and psychological effectiveness of LLM-generated feedback across three cohorts of MBA, MSc, and undergraduate students. Methods included linguistic…
Descriptors: Higher Education, College Students, Artificial Intelligence, Writing Evaluation
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustín Garagorry Guerra – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
The study highlights ChatGPT-4's potential in educational settings for the evaluation of university students' open-ended written examination responses. ChatGPT-4 evaluated 54 written responses, ranging from 24 to 256 words in English. It assessed each response using five criteria and assigned a grade on a six-point scale from fail to excellent,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Huiying Cai; Xun Yan – Language Testing, 2024
Rater comments tend to be qualitatively analyzed to indicate raters' application of rating scales. This study applied natural language processing (NLP) techniques to quantify meaningful, behavioral information from a corpus of rater comments and triangulated that information with a many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) analysis of rater scores. The…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Item Response Theory, Rating Scales, Writing Evaluation
Wesley Morris; Scott Crossley; Langdon Holmes; Chaohua Ou; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle McNamara – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2025
As intelligent textbooks become more ubiquitous in classrooms and educational settings, the need to make them more interactive arises. An alternative is to ask students to generate knowledge in response to textbook content and provide feedback about the produced knowledge. This study develops Natural Language Processing models to automatically…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Textbooks, Artificial Intelligence
McCaffrey, Daniel F.; Zhang, Mo; Burstein, Jill – Grantee Submission, 2022
Background: This exploratory writing analytics study uses argumentative writing samples from two performance contexts--standardized writing assessments and university English course writing assignments--to compare: (1) linguistic features in argumentative writing; and (2) relationships between linguistic characteristics and academic performance…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Academic Language, Writing (Composition), Academic Achievement
Bernadictus O. Plaatjies; Micheal M. van Wyk – Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2025
Prompt literacy has emerged as a pivotal concept in academic writing, particularly within higher education. This systematic literature review (SLR) critically examines and synthesizes research conducted between 2020 and 2025 on using prompting strategies to enhance academic writing among university students. The review aims to identify the types…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Meta Analysis, Academic Language, Content Area Writing
Davies, Patricia Marybelle; Passonneau, Rebecca Jane; Muresan, Smaranda; Gao, Yanjun – IEEE Transactions on Education, 2022
Contribution: Demonstrates how to use experiential learning (EL) to improve argumentative writing. Presents the design and development of a natural language processing (NLP) application for aiding instructors in providing feedback on student essays. Discusses how EL combined with automated support provides an analytical approach to improving…
Descriptors: Experiential Learning, Writing Instruction, Persuasive Discourse, Writing (Composition)
Xiaoling Bai; Nur Rasyidah Mohd Nordin – Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2025
A perfect writing skill has been deemed instrumental to achieving competence in EFL, yet it is considered one of the most impressive learning domains. This study investigates the impact of human-AI collaborative feedback on the writing proficiency of EFL students. It examines key teaching domains, including the teaching environment, teacher…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Evaluators, Writing Skills
MacArthur, Charles A.; Jennings, Amanda; Philippakos, Zoi A. – Grantee Submission, 2018
The study developed a model of linguistic constructs to predict writing quality for college basic writers and analyzed how those constructs changed following instruction. Analysis used a corpus of argumentative essays from a quasi-experimental, instructional study with 252 students (MacArthur, Philippakos, & Ianetta, 2015) that found large…
Descriptors: College Students, Writing Skills, Writing Evaluation, Writing Achievement
Nguyen, Huy; Xiong, Wenting; Litman, Diane – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2017
A peer-review system that automatically evaluates and provides formative feedback on free-text feedback comments of students was iteratively designed and evaluated in college and high-school classrooms. Classroom assignments required students to write paper drafts and submit them to a peer-review system. When student peers later submitted feedback…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation

Direct link
