NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)2
Since 2007 (last 20 years)4
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de la Torre, Eva M.; Gómez-Sancho, José-María; Perez-Esparrells, Carmen – Tertiary Education and Management, 2017
New public management and increasing levels of competition driven by global rankings are bringing the managerial practices of public and private higher education institutions closer together. However, these two types of institutions still maintain different objectives and traditions and enjoy different degrees of autonomy that are reflected in…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Institutional Evaluation, State Universities, Competition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parakhina, Valentina; Godina, Olga; Boris, Olga; Ushvitsky, Lev – International Journal of Educational Management, 2017
Purpose: Modernization of Russian higher education is carried out with the purpose of its successful integration into the global educational environment. However, the contemporary management model of most Russian universities demonstrates a low efficiency level. The purpose of this paper is to identify the problems of organizing the universities'…
Descriptors: Universities, Competition, Efficiency, Educational Quality
Lee, Lung-Sheng; Land, Ming H. – Online Submission, 2010
Due to changes from centralization to marketization, Taiwan's university governance must increase its effectiveness. The purpose of this paper was to introduce trends in and issues of Taiwan's university governance, describe university governance in the United States, and draw implications that Taiwan's university governance needs to learn from…
Descriptors: Democracy, Governance, Foreign Countries, Governing Boards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Taylor, B.; Harris, G. – South African Journal of Higher Education, 2002
Examined the relative efficiency of 10 South African universities between 1994 and 1997 using the analytical review technique. Identified the relatively efficient, relatively inefficient, and least efficient. Important efficiency factors include student population dimensions, quality and deployment of personnel resources, and allocation of…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Efficiency, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Birch, Anthony D. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1985
In many colleges, the business office has been isolated from other departments. The modern college business office reflects the highly efficient and technologically supported activities found in industry that have resulted in better services to the whole institution. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Agency Role, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
Richardson, Richard, Jr.; Martinez, Mario – Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009
"Policy and Performance in American Higher Education" presents a new approach to understanding how public policy influences institutional performance, with practical insight for those charged with crafting and implementing higher education policy. Public institutions of higher learning are called upon by state governments to provide…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Access to Education, Public Policy, Educational Policy
Blumenstyk, Goldie – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1993
A National Association of College and University Business Officers project collects data on college administrative and business costs and compiles them for comparative purposes. The unpublished findings are available to participants to gauge institutional efficiency. However, some feel more institutions must participate for data to be useful. (MSE)
Descriptors: Benchmarking, College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wagner, Alan – Higher Education Management, 1996
New methods of financing higher education used in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom are summarized and compared. The paper concludes that while these approaches are designed to improve efficiency, realize specific outcomes, and leverage additional funds from other sources, they may have unanticipated, unintended, and, in some…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Educational Economics, Educational Finance
Mahoney, Richard J. – Trusteeship, 1998
Universities can benefit from the experiences of corporations that have "reinvented" themselves in the past decade. Corporations did this by identifying their basic missions, disposing of or deemphasizing activities not essential to those missions, paring down institutional bureaucracies, and forming alliances with other corporations to share…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Bureaucracy, Business Administration, Change Strategies
Sanyal, Bikas C. – 1995
Many factors have contributed to the increased pressure on institutions of higher education worldwide to become more cost-effective. In 1990, the International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) launched an international research program on the problems of higher education management at the institutional level to create a knowledge base on…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Bureaucracy, Business Administration, Change Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grunig, Stephen D. – Journal of Higher Education, 1995
Based on survey data from 70 universities, this study concludes that differences in the organizational structure of development offices have no significant effect on fund-raising efficiency. However, because decentralized offices may be able to expand their activities more rapidly than centralized programs, decentralization may facilitate overall…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanley, Elizabeth C.; Adams, Jean W. – Research in Higher Education, 1994
Methodology and results of a study of administrative costs and structures at Iowa State University are summarized. Indicators of administrative efficiency are examined, including those related to organization, costs, salaries, and intensity of administrative functions. Some comparisons with peer institutions or to other units within the same…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrators, Case Studies, College Administration
Shafer, Barbara S.; Coate, L. Edwin – Business Officer, 1992
Benchmarking is an ongoing, systematic process for measuring and comparing work processes of one organization to those of another to identify best practices. Higher education can gain much from this technique, as industry has. The method is objective, reduces resistance to change and can lead to dramatic innovation and rapid development. (MSE)
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Change Strategies, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
New York State Office of the Comptroller, Albany. Div. of Management Audit. – 1993
An evaluation was done of State University of New York (SUNY) Central Administration costs by comparing them to peer systems and by evaluating how economically its duties were carried out. Central Administration provides oversight and executive leadership to the system and manages budgeting, accounting, capital facilities, student affairs and…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Costs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kavanagh, Richard E. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1985
Large and small businesses have long financed capital projects through tax-exempt financing. Colleges that need large sums of money to retrofit campuses with energy-efficient equipment can achieve the lowest borrowing cost available through bond insurance. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Bond Issues, Capital Outlay (for Fixed Assets), College Administration, Comparative Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2