NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tufts, Robert B., Ed. – College and University, 1987
An editorial and condensed account of hearings and recommendations of the U.S. House of Representatives concerning "diploma mills" and mail-order degrees and credentials is given. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Administration, Credentials, Degrees (Academic)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Drinan, Robert F. – Journal of College and University Law, 1993
It is proposed that the attorney-client privilege of confidentiality may be more important in the case of the university attorney than in the situation of the attorney representing the client as a law firm member. The principle is illustrated in a hypothetical case concerning research fraud. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Administration, Confidentiality, Counselor Client Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kamvounias, Patty; Varnham, Sally – Education and the Law, 2006
Every day, decisions are made in universities that affect students. When a decision adversely affects a particular student, what means of redress does that student have? The circumstances in which a student has a legal claim against their university are generally unclear. Courts have traditionally tended to draw a distinction between "purely…
Descriptors: Legal Problems, Court Litigation, Student Rights, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reams, Bernard D., Jr. – Journal of College and University Law, 1987
Legal issues in an institution's revocation of a previously-awarded academic degree because of plagiarism or academic dishonesty are examined in light of the public-private sector dichotomy, and the legal processes to which an institution must be alert when seeking degree revocation are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Administration, College Graduates, Constitutional Law
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stevens, Edward H. – College Teaching, 1996
A legal approach to due process in cases of college student cheating is outlined. Issues discussed include severity of the misconduct, need for informal vs. formal procedures, the due process paradigm as reflected in relevant court litigation, and steps in application of the paradigm (preliminary steps, notice and hearing procedures).(MSE)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Administration, College Faculty, College Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Olswang, Steven G.; Lee, Barbara A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1984
Current literature and federal agency pronouncements concerning falsification of discovery, theft of discoveries, and violations of accepted research procedures are examined, and internal institutional procedures for addressing these issues are suggested. Particular attention is given to due process afforded to faculty accused of such misconduct.…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Cheating, College Administration, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Parrish, Debra – Journal of College and University Law, 1995
Discussion of scientific misconduct, particularly plagiarism, explores the legal issues and compares the processes by which the Office of Research Integrity and the National Science Foundation conduct investigations and evaluate misconduct allegations. Relationships between allegations of plagiarism, copyright infringement, and theft of…
Descriptors: Agency Role, Cheating, College Administration, Copyrights