Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 16 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 92 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 205 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 462 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 1101 |
| Individual Differences | 1101 |
| Memory | 144 |
| Correlation | 120 |
| College Students | 117 |
| Task Analysis | 117 |
| Short Term Memory | 113 |
| Foreign Countries | 111 |
| Models | 110 |
| Learning Processes | 106 |
| Higher Education | 101 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Snow, Richard E. | 11 |
| Hunt, Earl | 8 |
| Unsworth, Nash | 7 |
| Sternberg, Robert J. | 6 |
| Jensen, Arthur R. | 5 |
| Linn, Marcia C. | 5 |
| Swanson, H. Lee | 5 |
| Whitely, Susan E. | 5 |
| Ackerman, Phillip L. | 4 |
| Davis, J. Kent | 4 |
| Kane, Michael J. | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 39 |
| Teachers | 11 |
| Practitioners | 10 |
| Students | 4 |
| Counselors | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 15 |
| Germany | 13 |
| China | 8 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 7 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Finland | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 6 |
| Netherlands | 5 |
| Pennsylvania | 5 |
| New York | 4 |
| Oregon | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRichardson, Leroy; Soucar, Emil – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Achievement, Adjustment (to Environment), Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedWalberg, Herbert J.; And Others – American Educational Research Journal, 1972
Perceptions of the school learning environment were examined in relation to three independent variables: the number of fith graders in the school, the percentage of girls of the total number, and the composite SES level. (CK)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Ecological Factors, Educational Environment, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedByrne, Sister Mary Ann; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1971
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Divergent Thinking
Peer reviewedSchmidt, Janet A.; Davison, Mark L. – Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1983
Outlines a conceptual framework, the Reflective Judgement model, which describes predictable differences in the intellectual development of college students. Validation attempts are discussed, and applications leading to sound counseling and educational interventions are suggested. The model is illustrated with an example of a classroom assignment…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Epistemology, Higher Education
Peer reviewedKeil, Frank C. – Intelligence, 1982
An approach to intelligence which emphasizes domain-specific constraints on knowledge structures is compared to information processing approaches. The evaluation of any cognitive ability as being intelligent crucially depends on prior specification of the formal constraints on the domains of knowledge from which that ability originates. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style
Peer reviewedCollins, W. Andrew – Journal of Broadcasting, 1981
Reviews findings of recent television research and discusses two dominant issues: the nature and determinants of children's attention to television, and the amount and kind of content retained by different age groups. It is recommended that research on media effects incorporate age-related and individual difference factors. Nineteen references are…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention Span, Broadcast Television, Children
Peer reviewedJarman, Ronald F. – Intelligence, 1980
A critique by Carroll of a study by Jarman and Das (EJ 171 820) is refuted in terms of the methodology and theory of the Jarman and Das study. Additionally, two general issues concerned with individual differences in cognitive processes and strategic behavior are elaborated beyond Carroll's discussion. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Factor Analysis, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedOffenbach, Stuart I. – Child Development, 1980
According to Hypothesis (H) theory, learning should be very difficult when the number of Hs the subject samples from is very large and/or the correct H is not available. These assumptions were tested with third- and fourth-grade children. In general, results supported these assumptions. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students, Failure
Peer reviewedPeterson, Penelope L.; Clark, Christopher M. – American Educational Research Journal, 1978
Using a stimulated recall technique, the reports of cognitive processes during teaching of twelve experienced junior high school teachers were recorded in an experimental setting and analyzed. Reports were related to teachers' cognitive style and ability. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Classroom Research, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedMacLeod, Colin M. – Journal of Research in Personality, 1979
Recent research in the area of individual differences in learning and memory is reviewed from a cognitive perspective. Using the two-state model of memory as a framework, individual variations in attentional, short-term store, and long-term store processes are discussed. (Editor)
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Style, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedForsyth, G. Alfred – Teaching of Psychology, 1977
Discussed is a study which measured the importance of considering differing student abilities to deal with cognitive ability task factors when developing research methodology and statistics courses in psychology. Topics discussed are data on which the study was based, testing procedure, testing instrument, results, and major findings. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Course Objectives
Peer reviewedChapman, Loden J.; And Others – Developmental Review, 1994
Argues that individual and group differences in priming performance scores are heavily influenced by overall speed and accuracy, and thus are a flawed reflection of internal activation of semantic priming. Suggests that meaningful comparison of groups on the activation underlying priming difference scores requires removing the effects of overall…
Descriptors: Children, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis
Peer reviewedMorrison, G. Rolfe; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1992
An error in the data analysis for a study reported in a 1988 paper by Kail is cited. The paper postulated a model that explained individual differences in the speed of processing on cognitive tasks. Reanalysis of the data suggested that support for the original conclusions is considerably weaker than reported. (LB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Processes, Data Analysis
Peer reviewedGeva, Esther; Siegel, Linda S. – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2000
Considers whether the development of reading skills in different orthographies varies primarily as a function of common underlying cognitive processes, or as a function of orthographic transparency. Concludes that when the script is less complex young children appear to develop their word recognition skills with relative ease, even in the absence…
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Cognitive Processes, Decoding (Reading), Elementary Education
Peer reviewedZiegert, Dannah I.; Kistner, Janet A.; Castro, Rafael; Robertson, Bruce – Child Development, 2001
Three studies replicated and extended Dweck's findings regarding young children's responses to challenging achievement situations. Findings indicated that a composite of cognitive, behavioral, and affective helplessness indices at kindergarten age predicted helplessness 1 and 5 years later, above and beyond gender and kindergarten task ability.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Followup Studies, Helplessness


