Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 16 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 92 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 205 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 462 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 1101 |
| Individual Differences | 1101 |
| Memory | 144 |
| Correlation | 120 |
| College Students | 117 |
| Task Analysis | 117 |
| Short Term Memory | 113 |
| Foreign Countries | 111 |
| Models | 110 |
| Learning Processes | 106 |
| Higher Education | 101 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Snow, Richard E. | 11 |
| Hunt, Earl | 8 |
| Unsworth, Nash | 7 |
| Sternberg, Robert J. | 6 |
| Jensen, Arthur R. | 5 |
| Linn, Marcia C. | 5 |
| Swanson, H. Lee | 5 |
| Whitely, Susan E. | 5 |
| Ackerman, Phillip L. | 4 |
| Davis, J. Kent | 4 |
| Kane, Michael J. | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 39 |
| Teachers | 11 |
| Practitioners | 10 |
| Students | 4 |
| Counselors | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 15 |
| Germany | 13 |
| China | 8 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 7 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Finland | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 6 |
| Netherlands | 5 |
| Pennsylvania | 5 |
| New York | 4 |
| Oregon | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWhitely, Susan E. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977
A factor analysis was used to study the relationships among response time and accuracy scores for a verbal analogies test, as well as a number of experimental variables designed to measure a series of information processing stages of the analogies task. (CTM)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Experimental Psychology, Factor Analysis, High Schools
Peer reviewedThornell, John G. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1977
Examines possible relationships between the analytic/global dimension of cognitive style, as defined by Davis and Klausmeier (1970) and measured by the Children's Embedded Figures Test (CEFT), and two modes of instruction varying in the level of written guidance (Intermediate and Maximal) provided the learner. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Educational Research, Educational Testing, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedSuler, John R.; Rizziello, Joseph – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1987
Forty-two undergraduates were tested to determine how scores on visual and verbal divergent thinking tests would be affected by instructions to use visual imagery and by individual differences in visual imagery ability. Results indicated that such instructions may interfere with test performance, but that individual differences did not influence…
Descriptors: Association (Psychology), Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewedWang, Margaret C.; Peverly, Stephen T. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1986
This paper presents a model for the study of self-instructive learning. The model is based on the assumption that individual differences in self-instructive abilities affect student learning. Application of the model in a classroom situation is discussed. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, Cognitive Processes, Individual Differences, Learning Processes
Peer reviewedBruch, Monroe A.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1986
Extended research on cognitive factors that may differentially underlie test anxiety and academic performance by assessing differences in (a) information-processing strategies used to encode course-work information, (b) degree of belief in one's negative self-statements, (c) Type A behavior, (d) test-taking skills, and (e) unrealistic expectations…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBenton, Stephen L.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
In three experiments, differences between good and poor writers were examined on six cognitive-processing tasks: ordered letters, ironic memory, letter reordering, word reordering, sentence reordering, and paragraph assembly. Both college and high school students were studied. Significant differences were found in abilities to hold and…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, High Schools, Higher Education, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedMatheny, Adam P., Jr.; Brown, Anne M. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Development, Cognitive Processes, Eye Movements
Peer reviewedGorfein, David S.; Blair, Claudia – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Cognitive Processes, Evaluation Methods, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedMcCauley, Clark; And Others – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Decision Making
Peer reviewedBurgess, Michael M.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Grade 2, Grade 4, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedMiller, Stuart; And Others – Psychological Reports, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Individual Differences, Information Processing
Peer reviewedGaertner, Samuel L.; Seidenberg, Bernard – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Attitudes, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Depth Perception
Peer reviewedSchulman, David; Shontz, Franklin C. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Human Posture, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedWachtel, Paul L. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedKurie, George D.; Mordkoff, Arnold M. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
Descriptors: Ability, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Individual Differences


