Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 6 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 18 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 34 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Chen, Chuansheng | 2 |
| Derry, Sharon J. | 2 |
| Jiang, Ting | 2 |
| Wolk, Stephen | 2 |
| Xue, Jingming | 2 |
| Zhang, Mingxia | 2 |
| Abrahamsen, Adele A. | 1 |
| Alderman, Linda B. | 1 |
| Barbara Tillmann | 1 |
| Barrett, Terry R. | 1 |
| Batterink, Laura J. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 8 |
| Postsecondary Education | 8 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 5 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom (England) | 3 |
| Germany | 2 |
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
| Iowa | 1 |
| Poland | 1 |
| Singapore | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Need for Cognition Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWolk, Stephen; DuCette, Joseph – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974
Descriptors: Arousal Patterns, Attention, Cognitive Processes, Incidental Learning
Peer reviewedKaplan, Robert – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976
The effects of four objective treatments (none, before text, after text, and combined before and after text) and two types of experience (practical and experimental) were investigated for intentional and incidental learning. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Educational Objectives, High School Students, Incidental Learning
Siegel, Alexanders W; Corsini, David A. – J Educ Psychol, 1969
Research supported in part by a Public Health Service Fellowship (MH-6668) and by Grant M-3519 from the National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service.
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Educational Psychology
Peer reviewedLane, David M. – Psychological Review, 1980
The incidental learning paradigm supports two findings concerning selective attention: (1) the difference between central and incidental task performance increases with age, and (2) the correlation between central and incidental performance decreases with age. Neither of these findings clearly supports the view that attentional selectivity…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Attention Control, Cognitive Development
Eysenck, Michael W.; Eysenck, M. Christine – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979
The effects of several factors on expended processing capacity were measured. Expended processing capacity was greater when information was retrieved from secondary memory than from primary memory, when processing was of a deep, semantic nature than when it was shallow and physical, and when processing was more elaborate. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Incidental Learning
Peer reviewedNecka, Edward; And Others – Learning and Instruction, 1992
The effects of incidental learning were assessed in 2 experiments involving 201 seventh graders in Poland through an experimental paradigm based on the levels of processing theory. Data suggest that an important aspect of intelligence is "opportunistic" learning (learning in advance). Intelligent people take cognitive advantage of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedAbrahamsen, Adele A.; And Others – American Journal of Mental Retardation, 1989
Ten children and adolescents with severe mental retardation were assigned in matched pairs to either a lexigram augmentative communication condition (graphic symbols) or a control condition (social stimulation). The three subjects who successfully acquired lexigrams also exhibited changes in attention, intentional communication, and sociability.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Attention Control, Children, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedAmerican Journal of Mental Retardation, 1989
Three papers comment on a paper by Abrahamsen et al (EC 212 728) on concomitants of success in acquiring an augmentative communication system (AAC) by persons with severe mental retardation. Comments focus on design and methodological requirements, principles of AAC, and sequence and process in indirect aspects of communicative gains. (DB)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Attention Control, Children, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedFriedrichs, Ann G.; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation, Incidental Learning, Learning Processes
Peer reviewedEvans, Robert C. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1980
First, third, and eighth graders performed four different orienting activities to different words. Under an incidental learning paradigm, the children's recognition was tested after the orienting activity. Age differences in recognition were absent, and the effect of the orienting activity responses on recognition supported depth of processing…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Elementary Education
Derry, Sharon J. – 1984
Attempts to train learning strategies have not produced marked or lasting increases in academic IQ, probably because current training models fail to recognize the evolutionary nature of strategies acquisition. Empirical and theoretical evidence supports an incidental learning model, which engineers the instructional environment following study…
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Cognitive Processes, Computer Assisted Instruction, Design Requirements
Hagen, John W.; Mesibov, Gary – 1968
The effect of verbal labeling in a serial position short term memory task was investigated. Forty female college students were given 16 trials each. Eight trials involved only central items which had to be recalled. The other eight trials involved both central and incidental items. Half of the subjects verbalized the names of the central items as…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Incidental Learning
Peer reviewedJohnston, William A.; Heinz, Steven F. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979
The effect of the sensory discriminability of targets from nontargets on depth of nontarget processing was examined. Depth of nontarget processing was measured by semantic overlap between targets and nontargets, reaction time, and nontarget recall. Depth of processing decreased as sensory discriminability increased, supporting multiple-loci…
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Processes, Higher Education, Incidental Learning
PDF pending restorationCopeland, Anne P.; Moll, Nadine W. – 1979
The differences in performance on a variety of cognitive measures were studied in 67 learning disabled (LD) and normal elementary school children. Younger and older Ss were administered tests of conceptual sorting, central and incidental learning, and selective attention. Teacher ratings of classroom hyperactive behavior were also examined. LD Ss…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Behavior, Classification
Peer reviewedRice, Mabel L.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1994
This study compared factors contributing to Quick Incidental Learning of new vocabulary by 50 5-year olds with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 comparison groups. Although SLI children exhibited a robust representational mapping ability, performance was modulated by a minimum input constraint and apparent problems with storage into…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comprehension, Incidental Learning, Language Acquisition


