Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 3 |
| Protocol Analysis | 3 |
| Reading Ability | 3 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Reading Processes | 2 |
| Reading Strategies | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Banner, Alyssa; Wang, Ye – Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2011
The purpose of this study was to identify and examine effective reading strategies used by adult deaf readers compared with student deaf readers. There were a total of 11 participants: 5 deaf adults ranging from 27 to 36 years and 6 deaf students ranging from 16 to 20 years. Assessment methods included interview and think-aloud procedures in which…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Deafness, Reading Strategies, Cognitive Processes
Manderino, Michael L. – ProQuest LLC, 2011
Building on previous studies of multiple text reading in history, this study aimed to contribute to that body of work by focusing on non-traditional multimodal sources. In an age of rapidly increasing access to and use of multimodal sources and a demand for reading and comprehending increasingly complex and specialized texts, it appeared there was…
Descriptors: Reading Instruction, Mixed Methods Research, Learning Modalities, Persuasive Discourse
Langer, Judith A. – 1993
To better understand the nature of students' approaches to literary understanding, a study compared the meaning-making approaches of traditionally judged above and below average readers. In all, 144 protocols were analyzed from 24 students (12 seventh graders and 12 eleventh graders, half in each class judged as above and half as below average…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Protocol Analysis, Reader Response

Peer reviewed
Direct link
