NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing one result Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Evitts, Paul M.; Searl, Jeff – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2006
The purpose of this study was to compare listener processing demands when decoding alaryngeal compared to laryngeal speech. Fifty-six listeners were presented with single words produced by 1 proficient speaker from 5 different modes of speech: normal, tracheosophageal (TE), esophageal (ES), electrolaryngeal (EL), and synthetic speech (SS).…
Descriptors: Artificial Speech, Reaction Time, Cognitive Processes, Intermode Differences