Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 3 |
| Contingency Management | 3 |
| Error Patterns | 3 |
| Adjustment (to Environment) | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Reaction Time | 2 |
| Animals | 1 |
| Behavior Modification | 1 |
| Brain Hemisphere Functions | 1 |
| Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bergstrom, Hadley C. | 1 |
| Dreisbach, Gesine | 1 |
| Hefer, Carmen | 1 |
| Holmes, Andrew | 1 |
| Lieberman, Abby G. | 1 |
| Lupker, Stephen J. | 1 |
| Piantadosi, Patrick T. | 1 |
| Pickens, Charles L. | 1 |
| Spinelli, Giacomo | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Spinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2023
In the standard Proportion-Congruent (PC) paradigm, performance is compared between a list containing mostly congruent (MC) stimuli (e.g., the word RED in the color red in the Stroop task; Stroop, 1935) and a list containing mostly incongruent (MI) stimuli (e.g., the word BLUE in red). The PC effect, the finding that the congruency effect (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Conflict, Cognitive Processes, Reaction Time
Hefer, Carmen; Dreisbach, Gesine – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
There is much evidence showing that the prospect of performance-contingent reward increases the usage of cuing information and cognitive stability. In a recent study, we showed that participants under reward conditions even continued using cues even when they were no longer predictive of the required response rule, even at the expense of higher…
Descriptors: Rewards, Contingency Management, Cues, Reaction Time
Piantadosi, Patrick T.; Lieberman, Abby G.; Pickens, Charles L.; Bergstrom, Hadley C.; Holmes, Andrew – Learning & Memory, 2019
Cognitive flexibility refers to various processes which enable behaviors to be modified on the basis of a change in the contingencies between stimuli or responses and their associated outcomes. Reversal learning is a form of cognitive flexibility which measures the ability to adjust responding based on a switch in the stimulus--outcome…
Descriptors: Animals, Cognitive Processes, Behavior Modification, Stimuli

Peer reviewed
Direct link
