Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Heuristics | 2 |
| Intuition | 2 |
| Attribution Theory | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Cognitive Mapping | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Kahneman, Daniel | 2 |
| Tversky, Amos | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedTversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel – Psychological Review, 1983
Judgments under uncertainty are often mediated by intuitive heuristics that are not bound by the conjunction rule of probability. Representativeness and availability heuristics can make a conjunction appear more probable than one of its constituents. Alternative interpretations of this conjunction fallacy are discussed and attempts to combat it…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Error Patterns, Evaluative Thinking, Heuristics
Kahneman, Daniel – American Psychologist, 2003
Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision making conducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in the context of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning. Intuitive thoughts, like percepts, are highly accessible.…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Intuition, Heuristics, Cognitive Processes

Direct link
