NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Strickland, Luke; Heathcote, Andrew; Humphreys, Michael S.; Loft, Shayne – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
Event-based prospective memory (PM) tasks require individuals to remember to perform a previously planned action when they encounter a specific event. Often, the natural environments in which PM tasks occur are embedded are constantly changing, requiring humans to adapt by learning. We examine one such adaptation by integrating PM target learning…
Descriptors: Memory, Models, Cognitive Processes, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boehm, Udo; Matzke, Dora; Gretton, Matthew; Castro, Spencer; Cooper, Joel; Skinner, Michael; Strayer, David; Heathcote, Andrew – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2021
Human operators often experience large fluctuations in cognitive workload over seconds timescales that can lead to sub-optimal performance, ranging from overload to neglect. Adaptive automation could potentially address this issue, but to do so it needs to be aware of real-time changes in operators' spare cognitive capacity, so it can provide help…
Descriptors: Prediction, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Strickland, Luke; Heathcote, Andrew; Remington, Roger W.; Loft, Shayne – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
Event-based prospective memory (PM) tasks require participants to substitute an atypical PM response for an ongoing task response when presented with PM targets. Responses to ongoing tasks are often slower with the addition of PM demands ("PM costs"). Prominent PM theories attribute costs to capacity-sharing between the ongoing and PM…
Descriptors: Evidence, Memory, Models, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rae, Babette; Heathcote, Andrew; Donkin, Chris; Averell, Lee; Brown, Scott – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Decision-makers effortlessly balance the need for urgency against the need for caution. Theoretical and neurophysiological accounts have explained this tradeoff solely in terms of the "quantity" of evidence required to trigger a decision (the "threshold"). This explanation has also been used as a benchmark test for evaluating…
Descriptors: Decision Making Skills, Reaction Time, Evidence, Accuracy