Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Age Differences | 26 |
Cognitive Development | 26 |
Evaluative Thinking | 26 |
Children | 9 |
Preschool Children | 8 |
Foreign Countries | 7 |
Adults | 6 |
Cognitive Processes | 5 |
Adolescents | 4 |
Elementary School Students | 4 |
Inferences | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Developmental Psychology | 12 |
Child Development | 7 |
Cognitive Development | 2 |
Contemporary Educational… | 1 |
International Journal of… | 1 |
Journal of Cognition and… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental Child… | 1 |
Author
Harris, Paul L. | 2 |
Keil, Frank C. | 2 |
Ronfard, Samuel | 2 |
Abadie, Marlène | 1 |
Abbaspour, Sufi | 1 |
Alvarez, Jeannette M. | 1 |
Amsel, Eric | 1 |
Arnold, Mary Louise | 1 |
Atance, Cristina M. | 1 |
Baltes, Paul B. | 1 |
Banerjee, Konika | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 25 |
Journal Articles | 24 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Waroquier, Laurent; Abadie, Marlène; Blaye, Agnès – Developmental Psychology, 2022
Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to a change in liking of a conditioned stimulus (CS) consecutive to its repeated pairing with a valent unconditioned stimulus (US). We relied on a multinomial processing tree model to compare the processes underlying EC in middle-aged children (n = 57, M[subscript age] = 8.65, range = 6.94-11.03; 31 females) and…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Young Adults, Evaluative Thinking
Noyes, Alexander; Dunham, Yarrow; Keil, Frank C. – Developmental Psychology, 2020
When faced with entities with potentially ambiguous category membership, adult category judgments are strongly biased toward dangerous and distinctive properties. For example, a cyanide-water mixture is categorized as cyanide. We used a developmental approach to better understand this cross-domain effect, which we term the asymmetric…
Descriptors: Bias, Classification, Evaluative Thinking, Attention
Ronfard, Samuel; Ünlütabak, Burcu; Bazhydai, Marina; Nicolopoulou, Ageliki; Harris, Paul L. – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2020
When presented with a claim that contradicts their intuitions, do children seize opportunities to empirically verify such claims or do they simply acquiesce to what they have been told? To answer this question, we conducted a replication of Ronfard et al. (conducted in the People's Republic of China) in two countries with distinct religious and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Preschool Children, Cognitive Development, Evaluative Thinking
Cacchione, Trix; Abbaspour, Sufi; Rakoczy, Hannes – Journal of Cognition and Development, 2020
It has been suggested that due to functional similarity, sortal object individuation might be a primordial form of psychological essentialism. For example, the relative independence of identity judgment from perceived surface features is a characteristic of essentialist reasoning. Also, infants engaging in sortal object individuation pay more…
Descriptors: Infants, Toddlers, Cognitive Processes, Logical Thinking
Ronfard, Samuel; Chen, Eva E.; Harris, Paul L. – Developmental Psychology, 2018
Although children often believe an adult's claims, they may have opportunities to check these claims by gathering relevant empirical evidence themselves. Here, we examine whether children seize such opportunities, especially when the claim is counterintuitive. Chinese preschool and elementary schoolchildren were presented with five different-sized…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Preschool Children, Elementary School Students, Cognitive Development
Atance, Cristina M.; Caza, Julian S. – Developmental Psychology, 2018
An important aspect of perspective-taking ability is the appreciation that mental states such as beliefs, desires, and knowledge change over time. The current study focused specifically on 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds' understanding that they will have knowledge in the future that they do not currently possess--for example, that when they are…
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Evaluative Thinking, Knowledge Level, Change
Banerjee, Konika; Kominsky, Jonathan F.; Fernando, Madhawee; Keil, Frank C. – Developmental Psychology, 2015
Across 3 experiments, we found evidence that information about who owns an artifact influenced 5- to 10-year-old children's and adults' judgments about that artifact's primary function. Children's and adults' use of ownership information was underpinned by their inference that owners are typically familiar with owned artifacts and are therefore…
Descriptors: Children, Adults, Ownership, Information Utilization
Riggs, Anne E.; Young, Andrew G. – Developmental Psychology, 2016
What influences children's normative judgments of conventional rules at different points in development? The current study explored the effects of two contextual factors on children's normative reasoning: the way in which the rules were learned and whether the rules apply to the self or others. Peer dyads practiced a novel collaborative board game…
Descriptors: Child Development, Cognitive Development, Logical Thinking, Context Effect
Krist, Horst – Developmental Psychology, 2010
In a series of 3 experiments modeled after infant studies, 3- to- 6-year-old children's intuitive knowledge about support was assessed. Different objects were shown either sufficiently supported or not. Children had to predict whether a block would remain standing on a platform upon release or make perceptual judgments about the possibility of a…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Young Children, Intuition, Physics

Gelman, Susan A.; Ebeling, Karen S. – Child Development, 1989
Examines the ability of 140 children of 3-5 years to use functional standards to judge size. The ability to use nonegocentric functional standards was present by age 3. However, 3-year-olds performed above chance only when their attention was directed to the relevant function. (RJC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Egocentrism, Evaluative Thinking

Pillow, Bradford H.; Hill, Valerie; Boyce, April; Stein, Catherine – Developmental Psychology, 2000
Three experiments investigated children's understanding of inference as a knowledge source. Most 4- to 6-year-olds did not rate a puppet as more certain of a toy's color after the puppet looked at the toy or inferred its color than they did after the puppet guessed the color. Most 8- and 9-year-olds distinguished inference and looking from…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Development, Deduction

Alvarez, Jeannette M.; Ruble, Diane N.; Bolger, Niall – Child Development, 2001
Tested the hypothesis that in predicting future behavior of an actor, older children rely on trait inferences, whereas younger children rely on global, evaluative inferences. Found that 9- and 10-year-olds' behavioral predictions were mediated solely by trait ratings, whereas 5- and 6-year-olds' predictions were mediated by evaluative ratings. The…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Behavior, Children, Cognitive Development

Smetana, Judith G. – Child Development, 1981
Examined preschool children's conceptions of moral and conventional rules. Children judged the seriousness, rule contingency, rule relativism, and amount of deserved punishment for 10 depicted moral and conventional preschool transgressions. Constant across ages and sexes, children evaluated moral transgressions as more serious offenses and more…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Evaluative Thinking, Moral Development

Bussey, Kay – Child Development, 1999
Investigated 4-, 8-, and 11-year-olds' ability to categorize intentionally false and true statements as lies and truths. Found that older children were more likely to categorize false statements as lies and true statements as truths than were 4-year-olds. Antisocial lies were rated as most serious, and "white lies" as least serious.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Classification, Cognitive Development

Thompson, Carol; Barresi, John; Moore, Chris – Cognitive Development, 1997
Examined whether prudence and altruism, in situations involving future desires, follow similar developmental courses between ages 3 and 5. Tested children on ability to forego current opportunity in order to gratify their own future desires or those of research assistant. Found that between ages 3 and 4, children develop some common mechanism…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Altruism, Cognitive Development, Decision Making
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2