NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harris, Paul L. – Journal of Cognition and Development, 2021
I consider three aspects of children's thinking about religious phenomena. It displays intriguing parallels with their thinking about scientific phenomena; it has an impact on their moral behavior; and it is likely to impact their religious experience. Children's gradual conceptual progress in the domain of religion resembles their conceptual…
Descriptors: Religion, Children, Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harris, Paul L. – Human Development, 2011
Most research on children's conception of death has probed their understanding of its biological aspects: its inevitability, irreversibility and terminal impact. Yet many adults subscribe to a religious conception implying that death marks the beginning of a new life. Two recent empirical studies confirm that in the course of development, children…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Death, Children, Religion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ganea, Patricia A.; Harris, Paul L. – Child Development, 2010
This research examined the ability of young (N = 96) children to learn about a change in the location of a hidden object, either via an adult's verbal testimony or from direct observation. Thirty-month-olds searched with equal accuracy whether they were told about the change or directly observed it. By contrast, when 23-month-olds were told about…
Descriptors: Object Permanence, Interference (Language), Cognitive Development, Deafness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Corriveau, Kathleen H.; Kim, Angie L.; Schwalen, Courtney E.; Harris, Paul L. – Cognition, 2009
Based on the testimony of others, children learn about a variety of figures that they never meet. We ask when and how they are able to differentiate between the historical figures that they learn about (e.g., Abraham Lincoln) and fantasy characters (e.g., Harry Potter). Experiment 1 showed that both younger (3- and 4-year-olds) and older children…
Descriptors: Fantasy, History, Young Children, Child Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Astuti, Rita; Harris, Paul L. – Cognitive Science, 2008
Across two studies, a wide age range of participants was interviewed about the nature of death. All participants were living in rural Madagascar in a community where ancestral beliefs and practices are widespread. In Study 1, children (8-17 years) and adults (19-71 years) were asked whether bodily and mental processes continue after death. The…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cognitive Processes, Rural Areas, Death
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker-Andrews, Arlene S.; Harris, Paul L. – Developmental Psychology, 1993
Two experiments assessed preschoolers' ability to understand pretend transformations. Subjects were two-, three-, and four-year-olds who viewed episodes in which either one or two similar props were altered in a pretend fashion. In both the single and double transformation, children demonstrated that they could keep track of the pretend…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Comprehension, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kavanaugh, Robert, D.; Harris, Paul L. – Developmental Psychology, 1994
Studied children's grasp of make-believe transformations they had seen enacted. Children indicated the pretend outcome by choosing a picture depicting no change or a picture depicting the pretend change. Older children chose correctly, even with the addition of a picture of an irrelevant transformation, but younger children did not. Autistic…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Age Differences, Autism, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Paul L.; And Others – Cognition, 1996
Children ages 3 to 5 years old are observed in a series of 3 experiments assessing their use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning. Results suggest that young children readily interpret the cause of an outcome in terms of a contrast between the observed sequence of events, and a counterfactual alternative in which the outcome did not…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Attribution Theory, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes