Descriptor
| Cataloging | 3 |
| Library Planning | 3 |
| Computer Output Microfilm | 2 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 2 |
| Library Catalogs | 2 |
| Microforms | 2 |
| Academic Libraries | 1 |
| College Libraries | 1 |
| Databases | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Microform Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHill, Janet Swan – Microform Review, 1982
The problem surrounding the cataloging of previously existing works in terms of the original or in terms of the present copy is discussed. Reasons why the description of the original in microforms cataloging may not be the ideal solution are suggested, and a bibliography of 12 items is included. (CHC)
Descriptors: Cataloging, Databases, Library Materials, Library Planning
White, Robert L. – 1979
Generated as the result of the deliberations of the COM Catalog Advisory Work Group, which depended heavily on a review of the available literature, individual analysis, and group discussion, this report is intended as a general planning document for Virginia Commonwealth university libraries concerning their possible implementation of a COM…
Descriptors: Cataloging, College Libraries, Computer Output Microfilm, Cost Effectiveness
Reibach, Lois R. – 1981
A brief statement on the advantages of using computer output microform (COM) for library catalogs introduces a general plan for implementing such a catalog in an academic library. The factors involved and types of decisions that must be made are discussed for each of eight steps in the process: determining the objectives of the catalog; choosing…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Cataloging, Computer Output Microfilm, Cost Effectiveness


