Descriptor
| Cataloging | 11 |
| Comparative Analysis | 11 |
| Library Networks | 11 |
| Online Systems | 6 |
| Foreign Countries | 5 |
| Library Automation | 5 |
| Library Technical Processes | 5 |
| Library Cooperation | 4 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 3 |
| Tables (Data) | 3 |
| Academic Libraries | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Baldwin, Paul E. | 1 |
| Bolin, Mary K., Ed. | 1 |
| Daehn, Ralph M. | 1 |
| Druschel, Joselyn | 1 |
| Hannan, Chris | 1 |
| Kemp, Elaine | 1 |
| Lazinger, Susan S. | 1 |
| MacDonald, R. W. | 1 |
| Renaud, Robert | 1 |
| Shoemaker, Thomas P. | 1 |
| Turner, Ann | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 3 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 2 |
| Australia | 1 |
| Israel | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedRenaud, Robert – Information Technology and Libraries, 1984
Using a basic vocabulary and simple model, this paper discusses four options available at the level of the individual bibliographic database for resolving conflicts in MARC exchange: addition, deletion, modification, and superimposition. Costs and benefits of each option and impacts on MARC exchange are noted. (Fourteen references are cited.) (EJS)
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Library Cooperation, Library Networks
Peer reviewedKemp, Elaine; And Others – Journal of Library Automation, 1981
This comparison of three major bibliographic utilities, prepared at the University of Oregon, provides evaluative information to members of the university community contemplating the use of their services. Included are basic characteristics, resource sharing, technical processing, and public services. (RAA)
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Databases, Information Services
Peer reviewedDruschel, Joselyn – Journal of Library Automation, 1981
Cost analysis of an automated network system and a manual system of cataloging and book processing indicates a 20 percent savings using automation. Per unit costs based on the average monthly automation rate are used for comparison. Higher manual system costs are attributed to staff costs. (RAA)
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Costs
Peer reviewedLazinger, Susan S. – Information Technology and Libraries, 1991
Describes ALEPH, the research library network in Israel, and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of its decentralized structure. Highlights include comparisons between RLIN and ALEPH; centralized versus decentralized networks; the format of ALEPH; authority control in ALEPH; and non-Roman scripts in both networks. (16 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Bibliographic Records, Cataloging, Comparative Analysis
Bolin, Mary K., Ed. – 1988
This report examines the costs of and services provided by the three major bibliographic utilities, OCLC (Online Computer Library Center), RLIN (Research Libraries Information Network), and WLN (Western Library Network). The services examined include acquisitions, cataloging, interlibrary loan, and reference. To examine costs, the format of the…
Descriptors: Bibliographic Utilities, Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Costs
MacDonald, R. W. – 1984
This report presents results from Phase 1 of the British Columbia Library Network (BCLN) Project, which included the installation and evaluation of a comprehensive library cataloging system using the University of Victoria Computing Center IBM 4341 computer. Evaluation included actual use of the system, performance and cost studies, feature and…
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Foreign Countries
Turner, Ann; And Others – 1980
Conducted to gather information on the practical impact of implementing either the Washington Library Network (WLN) system or one of two versions of the DOBIS system in British Columbia Union Catalogue (BCUC) member libraries, this study addressed four questions: (1) the effect the introduction of the new system would have on workflows; (2)…
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Data Processing, Information Retrieval
Daehn, Ralph M. – 1974
Prepared at the request of the Advisory Systems Committee of the Ontario Universities' Library Cooperative System, this report presents the results of study of the feasibility of a bilingual regional system for maps, or alternatively, the possibility of adapting the Guelph system to CARTESS. The report is presented in three sections: (1) a…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Cataloging, Classification, Comparative Analysis
Shoemaker, Thomas P. – 1977
A cost/benefit analysis of the Public Library Automation Network (PLAN) project was undertaken to evaluate those areas in library technical processing impacted by BALLOTS: searching the data base for catalog copy; cataloging with MARC or original catalog copy input by participating libraries; data entry of original records and modification of…
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Data Processing
Peer reviewedHannan, Chris – Information Technology and Libraries, 1982
Focuses on the centralized, online, shared-cataloging facility of the Australian Bibliographic Network operated by the National Library of Australia. Existing automated library systems in Australia, selection and implementation of Washington Library Network software, comparison of Australian and U.S. automation, and projections for future…
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Databases
Peer reviewedBaldwin, Paul E. – Canadian Library Journal, 1980
Describes the replication study undertaken by the British Columbia Union Catalogue (BCUC) to assess three online systems and their potential to meet the technical and economic needs of a number of libraries of all types and sizes in British Columbia. References are provided. (CHC)
Descriptors: Cataloging, Comparative Analysis, Economic Research, Feasibility Studies


