NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benjamin, Lehn M.; Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
Today's public policy discussions increasingly focus on how "networks" of public and private actors collaborate across organizational, sectoral, and geographical boundaries to solve increasingly complex problems. Yet, many of evaluation's key concepts, including the evaluator's role, assume an evaluand that is programmatically or organizationally…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Public Policy, Networks, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caracelli, Valerie J.; Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Two broad classes of mixed-method designs--component and integrated--that have the potential to combine elements of different inquiry traditions are described. The conceptual ideas advanced in the first chapter are illustrated through selected examples of several mixed-method integrated models. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Greene, Jennifer C. – 1985
The naturalistic research perspective assumes that reality is multiplistic, phenomenological, and context-dependent. This perspective legitimizes the subjective insights of the investigator by acknowledging the interdependence of facts and values as well as of the investigator and the object of investigation. Although discrepancies between…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Data Analysis, Guidelines, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation Practice, 1997
Advances the argument that advocacy in evaluation is inevitable when advocacy is understood as a value commitment to a particular representative ideal. The regulative ideal advanced in this article is a commitment to democratic pluralism. Three case examples illustrate these ideas. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Case Studies, Democracy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathie, Alison; Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997
The grounded experiences of two participatory evaluation case studies indicate that, when action is the desired outcome of an evaluation, somewhat less rather than more diversity of stakeholder participation is actually what is wanted. A narrowing of diversity is not necessarily in violation of democratic participatory aims. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Cultural Pluralism, Democracy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
In 2001, the Bunche Academy was chosen by its district to join in partnership with the Da Vinci Learning Corporation to embark on an ambitious whole-school reform initiative, especially designed by the corporation for low-performing schools. In this chapter, the author describes how, as illustrated in the Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Academy context,…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Educational Change, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research