Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Libraries | 2 |
| Botany | 2 |
| Zoology | 2 |
| Biochemistry | 1 |
| Biological Sciences | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Citation Analysis | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Cytology | 1 |
| Doctoral Dissertations | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Issues in Science and… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Policymakers | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Illinois | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNabe, Jonathan; Imre, Andrea – Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2008
We report on a citation analysis of Ph.D. dissertations in plant biology and zoology at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, undertaken to test the common assumption that scientists favor current research to such an extent that journal backfiles can be de-emphasized in academic library collections. Results demonstrate otherwise. The study is…
Descriptors: Doctoral Dissertations, Botany, Academic Libraries, Biology
Jones, Lyle V., Ed.; And Others – 1982
The quality of doctoral-level biochemistry (N=139), botany (N=83), cellular/molecular biology (N=89), microbiology (N=134), physiology (N=101), and zoology (N=70) programs at United States universities was assessed, using 16 measures. These measures focused on variables related to: (1) program size; (2) characteristics of graduates; (3)…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Biochemistry, Biological Sciences, Botany
