Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Block Scheduling | 4 |
| Mathematics Curriculum | 4 |
| High Schools | 3 |
| Academic Standards | 2 |
| Mathematics Instruction | 2 |
| Secondary School Mathematics | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| Class Size | 1 |
| Classroom Environment | 1 |
| Curriculum Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| ERIC Digests in Full Text | 1 |
| ERIC Publications | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kramer, Steven L.; Keller, Regina – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2008
This "Brief Report" summarizes results from a study that investigated joint effects of two innovations adopted at a high school in an affluent suburban community in the northeast United States: 4 x 4 block scheduling and the "Standards"-based curriculum, the Interactive Mathematics Program (IMP).
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Academic Standards, School Schedules, High Schools
Peer reviewedKramer, Steven L. – Mathematics Teacher, 1996
Reviews research on block scheduling as related to the study of mathematics. Suggests issues for mathematics teachers to consider as they decide whether or how to improve such schedules. Discusses mathematics achievement under a block schedule. Contains 40 references. (ASK)
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Evaluation, High Schools, Mathematics Curriculum
Durkin, Bernard – 1997
This digest discusses block scheduling and it relates to teaching standards, staff development standards, and assessment standards. The standards are examined in terms of how they can be achieved through the use of block scheduling, and conclusions stress the necessity of scheduling for maximum student learning. (DDR)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Block Scheduling, Classroom Environment, Educational Change
Peer reviewedKramer, Steven L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1997
Although research has confirmed block scheduling's nonacademic benefits, effects on academic achievement are mixed. Teachers do not always replace lecturing with more effective participatory teaching methods. To work best under an intensive or alternating block schedule, schools should adapt the math curriculum to reduce course redundancy and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Algebra, Block Scheduling, Class Size

Direct link
