Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Biology | 3 |
| Cognitive Science | 3 |
| Evolution | 3 |
| Bias | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Science Instruction | 2 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Beliefs | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Blancke, Stefaan | 1 |
| Boudry, Maarten | 1 |
| Bowers, Jeffrey S. | 1 |
| Braeckman, Johan | 1 |
| Davis, Colin J. | 1 |
| De Cruz, Helen | 1 |
| De Smedt, Johan | 1 |
| Schuchardt, Anita | 1 |
| Zhao, FangFang | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhao, FangFang; Schuchardt, Anita – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2019
Prior studies have shown that students have difficulty understanding the role of mutation in evolution and genetics. However, little is known about unifying themes underlying students' difficulty with mutation. In this study, we examined students' written explanations about mutation from a cognitive science perspective. According to one cognitive…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Educational Change, Teaching Methods, Genetics
Blancke, Stefaan; De Smedt, Johan; De Cruz, Helen; Boudry, Maarten; Braeckman, Johan – Science & Education, 2012
This paper discusses the relationship between religion and science education in the light of the cognitive sciences. We challenge the popular view that science and religion are compatible, a view that suggests that learning and understanding evolutionary theory has no effect on students' religious beliefs and vice versa. We develop a cognitive…
Descriptors: Evolution, Religion, Sciences, Scientists
Bowers, Jeffrey S.; Davis, Colin J. – Psychological Bulletin, 2012
According to Bayesian theories in psychology and neuroscience, minds and brains are (near) optimal in solving a wide range of tasks. We challenge this view and argue that more traditional, non-Bayesian approaches are more promising. We make 3 main arguments. First, we show that the empirical evidence for Bayesian theories in psychology is weak.…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Psychology, Brain, Theories

Peer reviewed
Direct link
