Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Benchmarking | 2 |
| Cutting Scores | 2 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 2 |
| Reading Tests | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hintze, John M. | 1 |
| Nelson, Peter M. | 1 |
| Silberglitt, Benjamin | 1 |
| Van Norman, Ethan R. | 1 |
| VanDerHeyden, Amanda | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Minnesota Comprehensive… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; VanDerHeyden, Amanda – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2017
We used existing reading (n = 1,498) and math (n = 2,260) data to evaluate state test scores for screening middle school students. In Phase 1, state test data were used to create a research-derived cut score that was optimal for predicting state test performance the following year. In Phase 2, those cut scores were applied with future cohorts.…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Longitudinal Studies, Benchmarking, Middle School Students
Hintze, John M.; Silberglitt, Benjamin – School Psychology Review, 2005
The purpose of this study was to compare different statistical and methodological approaches to standard setting and determining cut scores using R-CBM and performance on high-stakes tests. One thousand seven hundred and sixty-six students were followed longitudinally from first through third grades using R-CBM benchmark assessment. In addition,…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, High Stakes Tests, Standard Setting, Clinical Diagnosis
