NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Perelle, Ira B. – Reading Improvement, 1975
Indicates that the auditory modality was superior to the visual/written modality in learning and retention. (RB)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Educational Research, Elementary Education, Grade 2
George, Yvetta; Schaer, Barbara – 1987
The success of a reading laboratory using a learning modality approach was studied. The null hypothesis that there would be no significant difference among the levels of primary learning modality, sex, and race on the posttest of reading achievement for 31 second grade students, who read below grade level was tested at the 0.05 level after the…
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Grade 2, Kinesthetic Perception, Learning Modalities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shehan, Patricia K. – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1987
Reports a study which examined the effects of audio and visual approaches to rhythm reading and short-term retention in second and sixth grade students. Sixth graders learned the patterns twice as fast as younger children. Simultaneous use of both auditory and visual channels facilitates learning. (Author/AEM)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Grade 2, Grade 6, Memory
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Waugh, Ruth – 1971
One hundred and sixty-six second graders were administered the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA) and a visual and auditory memory test. Intraindividual discrepancies between a child's performance on comparable visual and auditory measures served to identify him as a visual or an auditory learner. Significantly more 5-year-old…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Aural Learning, Grade 2, Individual Differences
Shankweiler, Donald; And Others – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979
Second-grade students' reading proficiency was studied by determining the influence of rhyming or nonrhyming items on their recall of random letter strings, using visual and auditory presentations. Good and poor readers differed in their use of phonetic coding in working memory. (MH)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Cognitive Processes, Grade 2, High Achievement