NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers4
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 172 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Perez, Omar D.; Vogel, Edgar H.; Naraslwodeyar, Sanjay; Soto, Fabian A. – Learning & Memory, 2022
Theories of learning distinguish between elemental and configural stimulus processing depending on whether stimuli are processed independently or as whole configurations. Evidence for elemental processing comes from findings of summation in animals where a compound of two dissimilar stimuli is deemed to be more predictive than each stimulus alone,…
Descriptors: Cues, Associative Learning, Stimuli, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ong, Jia Hoong; Liu, Fang – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2023
According to Bayesian/predictive coding models of autism, autistic individuals may have difficulties learning probabilistic cue-outcome associations, but empirical evidence has been mixed. The target cues used in previous studies were often straightforward and might not reflect real-life learning of such associations which requires learners to…
Descriptors: Autism Spectrum Disorders, Probability, Cues, Associative Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicholas P. Maxwell; Mark J. Huff – Metacognition and Learning, 2024
Judgments of learning (JOLs) are often reactive on memory for cue-target pairs. This pattern, however, is moderated by relatedness, as related but not unrelated pairs often show a memorial benefit compared to a no-JOL control group. Based on Soderstrom et al.'s, "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition" 41,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Recall (Psychology), Cues, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Nicholas P.; Huff, Mark J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Research has shown that judgments of learning (JOLs) often produce a reactive effect on the learning of cue-target pairs in which target recall differs between participants who provide item-based JOLs at study versus those who do not. Positive reactivity, or the memory improvement found when JOLs are provided, is typically observed on related…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Memory, Associative Learning, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Whitlock, Jonathon; Chiu, Judy Yi-Chieh; Sahakyan, Lili – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
We report three item-method directed forgetting (DF) studies to evaluate whether DF impairs primarily item memory, or whether it also impairs associative memory. The current studies used a modified associative recognition paradigm that allowed disentangling item impairment from associative impairment in DF. Participants studied scene-object…
Descriptors: Memory, Associative Learning, Cues, Recognition (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chang, Minyu; Brainerd, C. J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2023
Making judgments of learning (JOLs) can sometimes modify subsequent memory performance, which is referred to as JOL reactivity. We evaluated two major theoretical explanations of JOL reactivity and used the dual-retrieval model to pinpoint the retrieval processes that are modified by JOLs. The changed-goal hypothesis assumes that JOLs highlight…
Descriptors: Cues, Evaluative Thinking, Models, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ostroff, Linnaea E.; Cain, Christopher K. – Learning & Memory, 2022
Local protein synthesis at synapses can provide a rapid supply of proteins to support synaptic changes during consolidation of new memories, but its role in the maintenance or updating of established memories is unknown. Consolidation requires new protein synthesis in the period immediately following learning, whereas established memories are…
Descriptors: Long Term Memory, Associative Learning, Brain, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Erdin Mujezinovic; Vsevolod Kapatsinski; Ruben van de Vijver – Cognitive Science, 2024
A word often expresses many different morphological functions. Which part of a word contributes to which part of the overall meaning is not always clear, which raises the question as to how such functions are learned. While linguistic studies tacitly assume the co-occurrence of cues and outcomes to suffice in learning these functions (Baer-Henney,…
Descriptors: Morphology (Languages), Phonology, Morphemes, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Amna Ghani; Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; Smadar Ovadio-Caro; Klaus-Robert Müller; Joydeep Bhattacharya – Creativity Research Journal, 2024
Chance favors the prepared mind, said Louis Pasteur. Sometimes, significant breakthroughs occur when we creatively integrate new information, leading to a creative insight or an Aha! moment, while at other times when we fail to use a clue, we remain stuck in our habitual thinking patterns. In this study, we hypothesized that the brain's transient…
Descriptors: Brain, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Cognitive Processes, Intuition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sapey-Triomphe, Laurie-Anne; Weilnhammer, Veith A.; Wagemans, Johan – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2022
Predictive coding theories of autism suggest that symptoms could result from an atypical learning of expectations. We assessed whether adults with autism could learn expectations in an uncertain context. Twenty-nine neurotypicals and 25 autistic adults participated in an associative learning task. After hearing a tone, participants had to predict…
Descriptors: Autism Spectrum Disorders, Cues, Adults, Expectation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
M. P. Agustín-Llach; J. Rubio – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2024
This paper examines the implications of the association patterns in our understanding of the mental lexicon. By applying the principles of graph theory to word association data, we intend to explore which measures tap better into lexical knowledge. To that end, we had different groups of English as Foreign language learners complete a lexical…
Descriptors: Associative Learning, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Psycholinguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murray, Carolyn A.; Tarlow, Maisy; Rissman, Jesse; Shams, Ladan – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2022
Associating names to faces can be challenging, in part because this task lacks an inherent semantic relationship between a face and name. The current study seeks to understand whether bolstering names with cross-modal cues--specifically, name tags--may aid memory for face and name pairings. In a series of five experiments, we investigated whether…
Descriptors: Memory, Naming, Human Body, Semantics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ansgar D. Endress – Developmental Science, 2024
In many domains, learners extract recurring units from continuous sequences. For example, in unknown languages, fluent speech is perceived as a continuous signal. Learners need to extract the underlying words from this continuous signal and then memorize them. One prominent candidate mechanism is statistical learning, whereby learners track how…
Descriptors: Syllables, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Diagnostic Tests, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Engle, Jae; Baker-Harvey, Hazel; Nguyen, Hieu-Kevin; Carney, Hunter; Stavropoulos, Katherine; Carver, Leslie J. – Child Development, 2021
The ability to learn from expectations is foundational to social and nonsocial learning in children. However, we know little about the brain basis of reward expectation in development. Here, 3- to 4-year-olds (N = 26) were shown a passive associative learning paradigm with dynamic stimuli. Anticipation for reward-related stimuli was measured via…
Descriptors: Brain, Preschool Children, Stimuli, Rewards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Nicholas P.; Perry, Trevor; Huff, Mark J. – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Judgments of learning (JOL) are often used to assess memory monitoring at encoding. Participants study a cue-target word pair (e.g., mouse-cheese) and are asked to rate the probability of correctly recalling the target in the presence of the cue at test (e.g., mouse -?). Prior research has shown that JOL accuracy is sensitive to perceptual cues.…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Layout (Publications), Decision Making, Memory
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12