Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Knowledge Representation | 2 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Memory | 1 |
| Modeling (Psychology) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 2 |
Author
| Crawford, Eric | 1 |
| Eliasmith, Chris | 1 |
| Gingerich, Matthew | 1 |
| Samuel J. Cheyette | 1 |
| Stephen Ferrigno | 1 |
| Susan Carey | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkStephen Ferrigno; Samuel J. Cheyette; Susan Carey – Cognitive Science, 2025
Complex sequences are ubiquitous in human mental life, structuring representations within many different cognitive domains--natural language, music, mathematics, and logic, to name a few. However, the representational and computational machinery used to learn abstract grammars and process complex sequences is unknown. Here, we used an artificial…
Descriptors: Sequential Learning, Cognitive Processes, Knowledge Representation, Training
Crawford, Eric; Gingerich, Matthew; Eliasmith, Chris – Cognitive Science, 2016
Several approaches to implementing symbol-like representations in neurally plausible models have been proposed. These approaches include binding through synchrony (Shastri & Ajjanagadde, 1993), "mesh" binding (van der Velde & de Kamps, 2006), and conjunctive binding (Smolensky, 1990). Recent theoretical work has suggested that…
Descriptors: Modeling (Psychology), Cognitive Processes, Neurology, Semantics
