NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andrews, Glenda; Halford, Graeme S.; Boyce, Jillian – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2012
Two experiments examined conditional discrimination in 4- to 6-year-olds. Children learned to choose one of two objects (e.g., circle) when the background was, say, red and to choose the other object (e.g., triangle) when the background was, say, blue. Awareness was assessed and interpreted as a marker of relational processing. In Experiment 1,…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Geometric Concepts, Children, Age Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daehler, Marvin W.; Bukatko, Danuta – Child Development, 1974
Discrimination learning studied in 3-year-olds, indicated that children over 30 months of age did better than younger children, and girls learned faster than boys after the first problem. (ST)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discrimination Learning, Learning, Perceptual Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Miller, Dolores J.; And Others – Child Development, 1976
Serial habituation of visual fixations was investigated through a design permitting cross-sectional, within-subject longitudinal, cohort longitudinal, and time-lag analyses. Results suggested that for all ages habituation was under way to the parts of the stimulus in order of the realitive saliencies. No one methodology appeared to significantly…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Discrimination Learning, Habituation, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Novack, Thomas A.; Richman, Charles L. – Child Development, 1980
Tests the effects of stimulus variability on overgeneralization and overdiscrimination errors in children and adults. The subjects (n=64), adults and five-, seven-, and nine-year-old children, participated in a visual discrimination task. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, College Students, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spiker, Charles C.; Cantor, Joan H. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1980
Results indicated the following: unitary stimuli were easier to encode; partitioned stimuli were easier to recode; recoding was much more difficult than encoding; extended training improved performance; second graders were slightly better at encoding and much better at recoding than were kindergarten children. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Etaugh, Claire F.; Pope, Barbara K. – Developmental Psychology, 1975
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, College Students, Discrimination Learning
Dunn, Lynne Anne – 1977
This study examined the ability of preschool children to process and use conceptual category information in a disrcimination learning task. A total of 60 boys and girls between the ages of 2 1/2 and 4 years completed a 3-choice discrimination learning task. On each of 12 trials, a child was presented with three magazine photographs: one of an…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Development, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Etaugh, Claire F.; Pope, Barbara K. – Child Development, 1974
Descriptors: Age Differences, Difficulty Level, Discrimination Learning, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scott, Marcia S.; And Others – Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1978
Preschool children between 3 and 5 1/2 years of age participated in a learning task in which a conditional relational problem was presented in either a blocked or random series. Prior training on the components of the task was also varied. (BD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ryan, Ann Stoy; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979
Forty elementary children (six and nine year olds) and 20 college students were required to discriminate identical pairs of visual stimuli from mirror images. It was hypothesized that a key factor in performance would be the extent to which orientation was a functionally significant attribute of the stimuli. (Author/MP)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Droit-Volet, Sylvie – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2003
Examined effects of a click signaling arrival of a visual stimulus to be timed on temporal discrimination in 3-, 5-, and 8-year-olds. Found that in all groups, the proportion of long responses increased with the stimulus duration, although the steepness of functions increased with age. Stimulus duration was judged longer with than without the…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Attention Control, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caron, Albert J.; Caron, Rose; Roberts, Jennifer; Brooks, Rechele – Developmental Psychology, 1997
Three experiments compared infants' reactions to videos of normally responsive women varying in eye contact. Found that, relative to frontal faces, three-month olds smiled less at images averting head and eye (H&I), head alone (H), and closing eyes (ECL) but not at averting eyes (E). Five-month-olds smiled less at H&I, E, and ECL but not…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attention, Discrimination Learning, Emotional Response
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smeets, Paul M.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1988
Investigates to what extent discrimination learning through time delay of multistimulus, distinctive-feature prompts is a function of the inclusion and configuration of the S-prompt. Results of two experiments with children aged four and five indicate that most subjects did not learn the task assigned unless two distinctive-feature prompts were…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Comparative Analysis, Cues, Discrimination Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Foley, Mary Ann; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1987
Two experiments examine the sorts of cues that might be available to facilitate children's ability to discriminate between memories for their own actions. Results suggest that the differences in discrimination performance demonstrate the importance of kinesthetic cues and visible consequences for children's memory discrimination. (Author/RWB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Turnure, Cynthia – American Journal of Psychology, 1972
Finding suggests that in perceptual learning situations like that of the present study, there may be no particular advantage to impoverishing the environment'' by minimizing irrelevant cues, at least as far as the children's immediate memory for stimuli is concerned. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Context Clues, Discrimination Learning, Preschool Children
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2