NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tecwyn, Emma C.; Bechlivanidis, Christos; Lagnado, David A.; Hoerl, Christoph; Lorimer, Sara; Blakey, Emma; McCormack, Teresa; Buehner, Marc J. – Developmental Psychology, 2020
Although it has long been known that time is a cue to causation, recent work with adults has demonstrated that causality can also influence the experience of time. In "causal reordering" (Bechlivanidis & Lagnado, 2013, 2016) adults tend to report the causally consistent order of events rather than the correct temporal order. However,…
Descriptors: Time, Cues, Influences, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vandermosten, Maaike; Boets, Bart; Luts, Heleen; Poelmans, Hanne; Wouters, Jan; Ghesquiere, Pol – Research in Developmental Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
Auditory processing problems in persons with dyslexia are still subject to debate, and one central issue concerns the specific nature of the deficit. In particular, it is questioned whether the deficit is specific to speech and/or specific to temporal processing. To resolve this issue, a categorical perception identification task was administered…
Descriptors: Speech Impairments, Acoustics, Classification, Speech
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Recker, Kara M.; Plumert, Jodie M. – Journal of Cognition and Development, 2008
We conducted three experiments to investigate how opportunities to view objects together in time influence memory for location. Children and adults learned the locations of 20 objects marked by dots on the floor of an open, square box. During learning, participants viewed the objects either simultaneously or in isolation. At test, participants…
Descriptors: Cues, Memory, Children, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Friedman, William J.; Lyon, Thomas D. – Child Development, 2005
In a study of the ability to reconstruct the times of past events, 86 children from 4 to 13 years recalled the times of 2 in-class demonstrations that had occurred 3 months earlier and judged the times of hypothetical events. Many of the abilities needed to reconstruct the times of events were present by 6 years, including the capacity to…
Descriptors: Cues, Children, Age Differences, Time Perspective
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, William J. – Child Development, 1991
In this study of the distinction between temporal distance and location, children were asked to judge the relative recency and time of target events that occurred one and seven weeks before testing. All judged recency and localized time of day correctly. Six- and eight- but not four-year olds localized longer time scales. (BC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cues, Individual Development, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, William J.; And Others – Child Development, 1995
Examined developmental changes in the use of distance-based and calendar-based approaches to estimate the recency of two events. Found that children's ability to discriminate temporal relationships between two events appears by four to five years of age. In contrast, use of calendar information and cognizance of annual patterns was found only in…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glenn, Christine G. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980
Stories were constructed in which minor variations in content influenced the relationship existing between statements. The stories had four episodes, which were either logically related or independent. First and third graders could more accurately recall the structure of the logically organized episodes than that of the temporally listed episodes.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Comprehension, Content Analysis