Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 20 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 93 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 192 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 440 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 1053 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1053 |
| Test Items | 449 |
| Item Response Theory | 284 |
| Test Construction | 275 |
| Item Banks | 232 |
| Simulation | 195 |
| Comparative Analysis | 139 |
| Foreign Countries | 117 |
| Higher Education | 104 |
| Test Format | 99 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Taiwan | 11 |
| Australia | 8 |
| Netherlands | 8 |
| New York | 8 |
| Turkey | 8 |
| United Kingdom | 8 |
| California | 7 |
| Spain | 6 |
| Canada | 5 |
| China | 5 |
| Denmark | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 7 |
| Education Consolidation… | 1 |
| Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHenly, Susan J.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
A group of covariance structure models was examined to ascertain the similarity between conventionally administered and computerized adaptive versions of the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT). Results for 332 students indicate that the computerized version of the DAT is an adequate representation of the conventional test battery. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewedZwick, Rebecca; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1994
Simulated data were used to investigate the performance of modified versions of the Mantel-Haenszel method of differential item functioning (DIF) analysis in computerized adaptive tests (CAT). Results indicate that CAT-based DIF procedures perform well and support the use of item response theory-based matching variables in DIF analysis. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewedYao, Tao-chung – Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 1995
Discusses the development and use of a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for learners of Chinese. Each time the examinee answers a question, the CAT program registers the answer and, based on the examinee's response, decides whether the next question should be harder or easier. (23 references) (MDM)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Chinese, Computer Assisted Testing, Language Proficiency
Peer reviewedDalton, David W.; Goodrum, David A. – Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 1991
Fifth and sixth grade children were assigned to three pretesting conditions: a full-length pretest, an adaptive pretest that exited learners when nonmastery was indicated, and a no pretest control. Learners in the adaptive treatment demonstrated higher levels of performance on the posttest and had greater motivation to continue the instruction.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedSmittle, Pat – Community College Journal, 1994
Discusses computerized adaptive testing, which is designed to provide students with an individualized examination adjusted to their skill levels. Indicates that scores are derived by comparing correct answers with the answers' difficulty rating. Highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the system and provides guidelines for successful…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Community Colleges, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Testing
Peer reviewedLegree, Peter J.; Fischl, M. A.; Gade, Paul A.; Wilson, Michael – Intelligence, 1998
A computerized adaptive test of word knowledge was administered over the telephone by reading items and response alternatives to 144 recent military enlistees who had completed the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. Correlations, factor loadings, and administration time indicate that the procedure is a good measure of crystallized verbal…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Ability, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewedWang, Tianyou; Kolen, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001
Reviews research literature on comparability issues in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and synthesizes issues specific to comparability and test security. Develops a framework for evaluating comparability that contains three categories of criteria: (1) validity; (2) psychometric property/reliability; and (3) statistical assumption/test…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Criteria
Coyle, James – American School Board Journal, 2001
The Northwest Evaluation Association helped an Indiana school district develop a computerized adaptive testing system that was aligned with its curriculum and geared toward measuring individual student growth. Now the district can obtain such information from semester to semester and year to year, get immediate results, and test students on…
Descriptors: Accountability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Data Interpretation
Peer reviewedRocklin, Thomas R. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Effects of self-adapted testing (SAT), in which examinees choose the difficulty of items themselves, on ability estimates, precision, and efficiency, mechanisms of SAT effects, and examinee reactions to SAT are reviewed. SAT, which is less efficient than computer-adapted testing, is more efficient than fixed-item testing. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewedSnyder, Lynn; Caccamise, Donna; Wise, Barbara – Topics in Language Disorders, 2005
This article discusses the main purposes of reading comprehension assessment and identifies the key features of good assessment. The article also identifies pitfalls that clinicians and educators should avoid to conduct valid assessments of reading comprehension, such as the degree to which the measure taps the constructive and integrative…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Content Validity, Academic Achievement, Reading Comprehension
Challis, Di – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2005
With advances in computerbased technologies and the emergence of elearning, there are unprecedented opportunities to reconsider assessment of learning (and, axiomatically, of teaching) and how this can be undertaken. One approach is adaptive assessment. Although it has existed in the tertiary environment since the time of the oral examination,…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Technology, Computer Assisted Testing
Sangwin, Christopher J.; Naismith, Laura – International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 2008
We present principles for the design of an online system to support computer algebra enabled questions for use within the teaching and learning of mathematics in higher education. The introduction of a computer algebra system (CAS) into a computer aided assessment (CAA) system affords sophisticated response processing of student provided answers.…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Mathematics Education, Algebra, College Instruction
Potenza, Maria T.; Stocking, Martha L. – 1994
A multiple choice test item is identified as flawed if it has no single best answer. In spite of extensive quality control procedures, the administration of flawed items to test-takers is inevitable. Common strategies for dealing with flawed items in conventional testing, grounded in the principle of fairness to test-takers, are reexamined in the…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring
Stocking, Martha L. – 1996
The interest in the application of large-scale computerized adaptive testing has served to focus attention on issues that arise when theoretical advances are made operational. Some of these issues stem less from changes in testing conditions and more from changes in testing paradigms. One such issue is that of the order in which questions are…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Schnipke, Deborah L.; Reese, Lynda M. – 1997
Two-stage and multistage test designs provide a way of roughly adapting item difficulty to test-taker ability. All test takers take a parallel stage-one test, and, based on their scores, they are routed to tests of different difficulty levels in subsequent stages. These designs provide some of the benefits of standard computerized adaptive testing…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Comparative Analysis

Direct link
