NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bennett, Randy Elliot; Steffen, Manfred; Singley, Mark Kevin; Morley, Mary; Jacquemin, Daniel – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
Scoring accuracy and item functioning were studied for an open-ended response type test in which correct answers can take many different surface forms. Results with 1,864 graduate school applicants showed automated scoring to approximate the accuracy of multiple-choice scoring. Items functioned similarly to other item types being considered. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Automation, College Applicants, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garrison, Wayne M. – Educational Research Quarterly, 1986
This study utilized a straightforward system of crediting successes and assigning failures to items not administered during computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to determine if the data yielded by CAT could be used to monitor item calibrations over time. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Goodness of Fit, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shermis, Mark D.; And Others – Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 1996
Describes a pilot study of computerized adaptive testing in the Michigan Educational Assessment Program's tenth-grade mathematics problem-solving and applications subtests. Comparisons are made to pencil-and-paper tests, and student reactions as determined by a posttest survey are discussed. (LRW)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Grade 10