Descriptor
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Test Selection | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Compensatory Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| New Jersey College Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedJaeger, Richard M. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
A liberal interpretation of Section 151 of Public Law 93-380, to implement effective local evaluation of Title I programs, is supported. Weaknesses are cited: (1) nationwide impact data, (2) unsound aggregation of Title I achievement gains, and (3) lack of consideration of alternative evaluation methods. (MH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedWhimbey, Arthur – Educational Leadership, 1985
Research suggests that special tests of reasoning ability are superfluous. Reading comprehension and algebra scores on common aptitude and achievement tests are highly correlated with scores on several reasoning tests. Furthermore, three programs in reasoning skills have been shown to improve reading comprehension scores in various settings. (MCG)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Tests


