Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 2 |
| Hierarchical Linear Modeling | 2 |
| Predictor Variables | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| College Outcomes Assessment | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Oral and Written Language… | 1 |
| Wechsler Individual… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSteedle, Jeffrey T. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
Value-added scores from tests of college learning indicate how score gains compare to those expected from students of similar entering academic ability. Unfortunately, the choice of value-added model can impact results, and this makes it difficult to determine which results to trust. The research presented here demonstrates how value-added models…
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Postsecondary Education, Achievement Tests, Models
Download full textKim, Young-Suk; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Wanzek, Jeanne; Gatlin, Brandy – Grantee Submission, 2015
We had 3 aims in the present study: (a) to examine the dimensionality of various evaluative approaches to scoring writing samples (e.g., quality, productivity, and curriculum-based measurement [CBM] writing scoring), (b) to investigate unique language and cognitive predictors of the identified dimensions, and (c) to examine gender gap in the…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Gender Differences, Curriculum Based Assessment, Scoring
