NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Yucheng Chu; Peng He; Hang Li; Haoyu Han; Kaiqi Yang; Yu Xue; Tingting Li; Yasemin Copur-Gencturk; Joseph Krajcik; Jiliang Tang – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2025
Short answer assessment is a vital component of science education, allowing evaluation of students' complex three-dimensional understanding. Large language models (LLMs) that possess human-like ability in linguistic tasks are increasingly popular in assisting human graders to reduce their workload. However, LLMs' limitations in domain knowledge…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Science Education, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustín Garagorry Guerra – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
The study highlights ChatGPT-4's potential in educational settings for the evaluation of university students' open-ended written examination responses. ChatGPT-4 evaluated 54 written responses, ranging from 24 to 256 words in English. It assessed each response using five criteria and assigned a grade on a six-point scale from fail to excellent,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schneider, Johannes; Richner, Robin; Riser, Micha – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2023
Autograding short textual answers has become much more feasible due to the rise of NLP and the increased availability of question-answer pairs brought about by a shift to online education. Autograding performance is still inferior to human grading. The statistical and black-box nature of state-of-the-art machine learning models makes them…
Descriptors: Grading, Natural Language Processing, Computer Assisted Testing, Ethics