Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 15 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 17 |
| Educational Indicators | 17 |
| State Regulation | 17 |
| Educational Policy | 10 |
| Educational Assessment | 9 |
| Federal Legislation | 9 |
| State Standards | 8 |
| Federal Programs | 7 |
| Academic Achievement | 6 |
| Academic Standards | 6 |
| Policy Analysis | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 7 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Collected Works - General | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 9 |
| High Schools | 5 |
| Secondary Education | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 6 |
| American Recovery and… | 2 |
| Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wong, Vivian C.; Wing, Coady; Martin, David; Krishnamachari, Anandita – Educational Researcher, 2018
When No Child Left Behind (NCLB) became law in 2002, it was viewed as an effort to create uniform standards for students and schools across the country. More than a decade later, we know surprisingly little about how states actually implemented NCLB and the extent to which state implementation decisions managed to undo the centralizing objectives…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, State Regulation
Marion, Scott – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2017
The U.S. Department of Education (ED) provided feedback to several states recently regarding the states' ESSA plan. Among other issues, ED raised questions regarding the use of indices for the achievement indicator. ED expressed concerns that some of the states' index systems allowed the performance of high achieving students to "mask"…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Indicators, Accountability, State Regulation
Petrilli, Michael J.; Griffith, David; Wright, Brandon L. – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2016
A companion piece to "High Stakes for High Achievers: State Accountability in the Age of ESSA," this report appraises states' current (or planned) accountability systems as they affect high-achieving students in high school. They were examined and rated based on whether they incorporate under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) the…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Accountability, State Regulation, State Standards
Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Cormier, Damien C.; Thurlow, Martha L. – Remedial and Special Education, 2011
The characteristics of a state's accommodations policy may affect a state's decision about whether to develop an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards (AA-MAS). A very restrictive accommodations policy may make it more difficult for some students to participate in the state's regular assessment used for accountability…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Discriminant Analysis, Academic Accommodations (Disabilities), Testing Accommodations
Ladner, Matthew – Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, 2011
Jeb Bush campaigned for governor on a clear and bracing set of education reforms in 1998. Having won office, he immediately pursued a dual-track strategy for reforming Florida's K-12 education system: standards and accountability for public schools, choice and options for parents. Florida lawmakers followed those reforms with additional measures.…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Academic Achievement, National Competency Tests, Educational Change
Kober, Nancy; Rentner, Diane Stark – Center on Education Policy, 2011
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), also known as the economic stimulus bill, channeled an unprecedented $100 billion into the nation's public education system. These funds were intended not only to avert teacher layoffs and stabilize state and local education budgets in the short term, but also to encourage reforms that…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Grants, Public Education, Program Implementation
Data Quality Campaign, 2011
This letter is submitted to comment on the U.S. Department of Education's (ED) proposed revisions to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's (ARRA) State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF), as published in the September 23, 2011, Federal Register. Overall, the Data Quality Campaign believes the proposed changes strike a sensible balance: they…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Federal Aid, Accountability, Educational Finance
Center on Education Policy, 2010
This paper provides information about North Carolina End-of-Course Exams. The North Carolina End-of-Course Assessments were developed for two purposes: (1) To provide accurate measurement of individual student knowledge and skills specified in the North Carolina Standard Course of Study; and (2) To provide accurate measurement of the knowledge and…
Descriptors: Exit Examinations, Academic Standards, State Standards, Academic Failure
McIntosh, Shelby – Center on Education Policy, 2012
Since 2002, the Center on Education Policy (CEP) at The George Washington University, a national advocate for public education and improving public schools, has been studying state high school exit examinations--tests students must pass to receive a high school diploma. This year marks the 11th year CEP has reported on exit exams in order to help…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, State Standards, Exit Examinations, High Schools
Center on Education Policy, 2010
This paper provides information about Oregon State Assessment System. Its purpose is to assess proficiency in the Essential Skills for the purpose of earning a regular or modified high school diploma. Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills is also used for federal accountability purposes under No Child Left Behind. [For the main report,…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Exit Examinations, High Schools
McQuillan, Patrick J.; Salomon-Fernandez, Yves – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2008
Since passage of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2002, state departments of education across the U.S. have been busy creating or modifying school accountability systems to meet NCLB guidelines. Ultimately, NCLB seeks to have all public school students proficient in English/Language Arts and mathematics by 2014. To identify schools…
Descriptors: Intervention, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators
Gooden, John S.; Harrington, Sonja Y.; Findlay, Hyacinth E.; King, Gwendolyn V. – Journal of School Choice, 2008
The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine nine states' policy responses to the Unsafe School Choice Option between 2002 and 2007. These states had 199 schools designated as "persistently dangerous schools" since 2002. Unsafe School Choice Option is one of the school choice options of the No Child Left Behind law that required…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, School Choice, Policy Analysis, School Safety
Center on Education Policy, 2010
This paper provides information about Virginia's Standards of Learning (SOL) End-of-Course Exams. The purpose of the end-of-course assessments is to measure the achievement of students on the Standards of Learning adopted by the Virginia Board of Education for specific high school courses, and to ensure that students graduating from Virginia…
Descriptors: State Standards, Exit Examinations, Credits, Academic Standards
Orkodashvili, Mariam – Online Submission, 2009
The paper discusses the major issues connected with the accreditation procedures in higher education system in the U.S. The questions raised are as follows: what are the reliable and credible indicators of quality instruction that could be measured in the process of accreditation of higher education institutions? How does greater transparency in…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Academic Freedom, Distance Education, Accreditation (Institutions)
Miller-Whitehead, Marie – 2003
This study examined Alabama and Tennessee state education report card data for 1998 through 2003. The purpose of the study was to determine whether there were measurable differences in reported accountability indicators between districts that elected and those that appointed superintendents. The study also examined trends in attrition and hiring…
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Indicators, Elections, Elementary Secondary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Peer reviewed
Direct link
