Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 5 |
| Disabilities | 5 |
| Value Added Models | 5 |
| Cohort Analysis | 4 |
| Comparative Analysis | 4 |
| Computation | 4 |
| Correlation | 4 |
| Elementary School Students | 4 |
| Growth Models | 4 |
| Language Arts | 4 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Elliott, Stephen N. | 4 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 4 |
| Schulte, Ann C. | 4 |
| Stevens, Joseph J. | 4 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 4 |
| Yel, Nedim | 4 |
| Anderson, Daniel | 3 |
| Matta, Tyler | 2 |
| Pullin, Diana | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Arizona | 1 |
| North Carolina | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title VI | 1 |
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
| Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textSchulte, Ann C.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2018
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Stevens, Joseph J.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Schulte, Ann C.; Tindal, Gerald; Yel, Nedim; Anderson, Daniel; Matta, Tyler; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Schulte, Ann C.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Yel, Nedim; Tindal, Gerald; Anderson, Daniel; Elliott, Stephen N. – National Center on Assessment and Accountability for Special Education, 2017
This technical report is one of a series of four technical reports that describe the results of a study comparing eight alternative models for estimating school academic achievement using data from the Arizona, North Carolina, Oregon, and Pennsylvania accountability systems. The purpose of these reports was to evaluate a broad range of models…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Models, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedPullin, Diana – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2015
Recent efforts to change the teaching profession and teacher preparation include a number of innovations to use portfolio assessment, value added measures (VAM), accountability metrics and other corporate education reform ideas. These approaches may provoke considerable potential legal consequences. Traditional constitutional and civil rights…
Descriptors: Legal Problems, Teacher Evaluation, Preservice Teacher Education, Educational Change
