Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Loomis, Susan Cooper | 2 |
| Castellano, Katherine E. | 1 |
| Hester, Yvette | 1 |
| Ho, Andrew D. | 1 |
| Kendall, John S. | 1 |
| Keng, Leslie | 1 |
| McClarty, Katie Larsen | 1 |
| Murphy, Daniel | 1 |
| Richardson, Amy T. | 1 |
| Ryan, Susan S. | 1 |
| Tong, Ye | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMcClarty, Katie Larsen; Murphy, Daniel; Keng, Leslie; Turhan, Ahmet; Tong, Ye – Pearson, 2012
There is much focus at the state and national levels in graduating students that are prepared for college and careers. In order for students to be prepared at the end of their K-12 education, indicators are also needed along the way about whether students are on track. Using historical state data, nine different methods were used to align…
Descriptors: Elementary School Mathematics, Secondary School Mathematics, Alignment (Education), Academic Standards
Castellano, Katherine E.; Ho, Andrew D. – Council of Chief State School Officers, 2013
This "Practitioner's Guide to Growth Models," commissioned by the Technical Issues in Large-Scale Assessment (TILSA) and Accountability Systems & Reporting (ASR), collaboratives of the "Council of Chief State School Officers," describes different ways to calculate student academic growth and to make judgments about the…
Descriptors: Guides, Models, Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains
Download full textKendall, John S.; Ryan, Susan S.; Richardson, Amy T. – Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL), 2005
This paper describes a practical method for identifying and communicating expectations of student performance in the classroom. The method has been used at McREL for clients who require a systematic approach to setting performance expectations and communicating these to their constituents. This document in organized in the following sections: (1)…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Standard Setting
Hester, Yvette – 1993
Some of the different approaches to standard setting are discussed. Brief comments and references are offered concerning strategies that rely primarily on the use of expert judgment. Controversy surrounds methods that use expert judges, as well as those using test groups to set scores empirically. A minimax procedure developed by H. Huynh, an…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Classification, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Methods
Loomis, Susan Cooper – 2000
In 1999 a validation study of the 1998 Civics Assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) was conducted, combining a similarity classification study and a booklet classification study. The rationale was that if the teachers who had participated in the 5-day achievement levels-setting process could not use the descriptions…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Civics, Classification
Loomis, Susan Cooper – 2000
This paper describes the feedback included in operational achievement level setting (ALS) procedures for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). It does not describe the feedback form field trials, pilot studies, or other research studies related to the NAEP. The NAEP ALS process includes three rounds of item-by-item ratings, and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Civics, Classification
